Explanation:
**Considering dry run summary**

I think I need to create a sample dry run summary for my report. I should do a synthetic summary and maybe use a temporary setup to run tests. After that, it could be helpful to execute the code and gather the output for aggregation. I’m also wondering if I need to avoid committing changes that aren't really related to siblings—just warnings. Maybe a git diff would help clarify things?

from pathlib import Path
from tempfile import TemporaryDirectory
import zipfile, json
from jarvis_finance.storage.database import connect_memory
from jarvis_finance.storage.migrations import apply_migrations
from jarvis_finance.imports.broker_parsers import parse_postfinance_docx, parse_true_wealth_docx, parse_raiffeisen_xlsx
from jarvis_finance.imports.broker_mapping import run_broker_import_dry_run

def docx(path, rows):
    def tc(t): return f'<w:tc><w:p><w:r><w:t>{t}</w:t></w:r></w:p></w:tc>'
    trs=''.join('<w:tr>'+''.join(tc(c) for c in r)+'</w:tr>' for r in rows)
    xml=f'<w:document xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main"><w:body><w:tbl>{trs}</w:tbl></w:body></w:document>'
    with zipfile.ZipFile(path,'w') as z: z.writestr('word/document.xml', xml); z.writestr('[Content_Types].xml','')
def xlsx(path, rows):
    shared=[]; idx={}; srows=[]
    for ri,r in enumerate(rows,1):
        cells=[]
        for ci,v in enumerate(r):
            idx.setdefault(v,len(shared));
            if len(shared)==idx[v]: shared.append(v)
            cells.append(f'<c r="{chr(65+ci)}{ri}" t="s"><v>{idx[v]}</v></c>')
        srows.append(f'<row r="{ri}">'+''.join(cells)+'</row>')
    ss='<sst xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/spreadsheetml/2006/main">'+''.join(f'<si><t>{s}</t></si>' for s in shared)+'</sst>'
    sh='<worksheet xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/spreadsheetml/2006/main"><sheetData>'+''.join(srows)+'</sheetData></worksheet>'
    with zipfile.ZipFile(path,'w') as z: z.writestr('xl/sharedStrings.xml', ss); z.writestr('xl/worksheets/sheet1.xml', sh); z.writestr('[Content_Types].xml','')
with TemporaryDirectory() as d:
    d=Path(d); c=connect_memory(); apply_migrations(c)
    pf=d/'pf.docx'; tw=d/'tw.docx'; rf=d/'rf.xlsx'
    docx(pf, [['Produkt','Menge','Währung','Marktwert'],['Synthetic ETF','Menge vorhanden','CHF','Marktwert vorhanden'],['Cash Konto','','CHF','']])
    docx(tw, [['Position','Anteile','Währung','Wert'],['Global ETF','Anteile vorhanden','USD','Wert vorhanden'],['Cash USD','','USD','Wert vorhanden']])
    xlsx(rf, [['Label','Typ','Währung'],['Privatkonto','Konto','CHF'],['Depot Anlagen gesamt','Anlage','CHF']])
    out=[]
    for parsed,path in [(parse_postfinance_docx(pf),pf),(parse_true_wealth_docx(tw),tw),(parse_raiffeisen_xlsx(rf),rf)]:
        s=run_broker_import_dry_run(c, parsed, source_filename=path.name)
        out.append({k:s[k] for k in ['rows_total','candidate_positions','candidate_cash_rows','mapped_positions','blocked_positions','review_items_created','warnings_count','errors_count'] } | {'source':parsed.source_platform,'quality_flags_summary':s['quality_flags_summary']})
    print(json.dumps(out, ensure_ascii=False, sort_keys=True))


Output:
--- stderr ---
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/tmp/hermes_sandbox_hl8ijyl2/script.py", line 4, in <module>
    from jarvis_finance.storage.database import connect_memory
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'jarvis_finance'

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/tmp/hermes_sandbox_hl8ijyl2/script.py", line 4, in <module>
    from jarvis_finance.storage.database import connect_memory
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'jarvis_finance'


terminal

set -euo pipefail
cd /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager
PYTHONPATH=src python - <<'PY'
from pathlib import Path
from tempfile import TemporaryDirectory
import zipfile, json
from jarvis_finance.storage.database import connect_memory
from jarvis_finance.storage.migrations import apply_migrations
from jarvis_finance.imports.broker_parsers import parse_postfinance_docx, parse_true_wealth_docx, parse_raiffeisen_xlsx
from jarvis_finance.imports.broker_mapping import run_broker_import_dry_run

def docx(path, rows):
    def tc(t): return f'<w:tc><w:p><w:r><w:t>{t}</w:t></w:r></w:p></w:tc>'
    trs=''.join('<w:tr>'+''.join(tc(c) for c in r)+'</w:tr>' for r in rows)
    xml=f'<w:document xmlns:w="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/wordprocessingml/2006/main"><w:body><w:tbl>{trs}</w:tbl></w:body></w:document>'
    with zipfile.ZipFile(path,'w') as z: z.writestr('word/document.xml', xml); z.writestr('[Content_Types].xml','')
def xlsx(path, rows):
    shared=[]; idx={}; srows=[]
    for ri,r in enumerate(rows,1):
        cells=[]
        for ci,v in enumerate(r):
            if v not in idx:
                idx[v]=len(shared); shared.append(v)
            cells.append(f'<c r="{chr(65+ci)}{ri}" t="s"><v>{idx[v]}</v></c>')
        srows.append(f'<row r="{ri}">'+''.join(cells)+'</row>')
    ss='<sst xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/spreadsheetml/2006/main">'+''.join(f'<si><t>{s}</t></si>' for s in shared)+'</sst>'
    sh='<worksheet xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/spreadsheetml/2006/main"><sheetData>'+''.join(srows)+'</sheetData></worksheet>'
    with zipfile.ZipFile(path,'w') as z: z.writestr('xl/sharedStrings.xml', ss); z.writestr('xl/worksheets/sheet1.xml', sh); z.writestr('[Content_Types].xml','')
with TemporaryDirectory() as tmp:
    d=Path(tmp); c=connect_memory(); apply_migrations(c)
    pf=d/'pf.docx'; tw=d/'tw.docx'; rf=d/'rf.xlsx'
    docx(pf, [['Produkt','Menge','Währung','Marktwert'],['Synthetic ETF','Menge vorhanden','CHF','Marktwert vorhanden'],['Cash Konto','','CHF','']])
    docx(tw, [['Position','Anteile','Währung','Wert'],['Global ETF','Anteile vorhanden','USD','Wert vorhanden'],['Cash USD','','USD','Wert vorhanden']])
    xlsx(rf, [['Label','Typ','Währung'],['Privatkonto','Konto','CHF'],['Depot Anlagen gesamt','Anlage','CHF']])
    out=[]
    for parsed,path in [(parse_postfinance_docx(pf),pf),(parse_true_wealth_docx(tw),tw),(parse_raiffeisen_xlsx(rf),rf)]:
        s=run_broker_import_dry_run(c, parsed, source_filename=path.name)
        out.append({'source':parsed.source_platform, **{k:s[k] for k in ['rows_total','candidate_positions','candidate_cash_rows','mapped_positions','blocked_positions','review_items_created','warnings_count','errors_count']}, 'quality_flags_summary':s['quality_flags_summary']})
    print(json.dumps(out, ensure_ascii=False, sort_keys=True))
PY


Output: [{"blocked_positions": 1, "candidate_cash_rows": 1, "candidate_positions": 1, "errors_count": 0, "mapped_positions": 0, "quality_flags_summary": {"cost_basis_uncertain": 1, "market_value_legacy": 1, "missing_isin": 1, "missing_ticker": 1, "needs_manual_review": 2, "snapshot_only": 2}, "review_items_created": 2, "rows_total": 3, "source": "PostFinance", "warnings_count": 8}, {"blocked_positions": 1, "candidate_cash_rows": 1, "candidate_positions": 1, "errors_count": 0, "mapped_positions": 0, "quality_flags_summary": {"cost_basis_uncertain": 1, "missing_fx": 2, "missing_isin": 1, "missing_ticker": 1, "needs_manual_review": 2, "snapshot_only": 2}, "review_items_created": 2, "rows_total": 3, "source": "True Wealth", "warnings_count": 9}, {"blocked_positions": 1, "candidate_cash_rows": 1, "candidate_positions": 1, "errors_count": 0, "mapped_positions": 0, "quality_flags_summary": {"aggregate_only": 1, "cash_snapshot_candidate": 1, "missing_instrument_details": 1, "needs_manual_review": 2}, "review_items_created": 2, "rows_total": 3, "source": "Raiffeisen", "warnings_count": 5}]


Explanation:
**Verifying and pushing changes**

I want to make sure I've double-checked everything after dealing with the pycache files. It's always good to be thorough, you know? Then, I'll go ahead and commit the changes and push them to the repository. I can’t help but feel that it’s important to keep everything organized, so nothing gets lost later on. Let's get this done!

set -euo pipefail
cd /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager
PYTHONPATH=src python -m compileall -q src tests
PYTHONPATH=src pytest -q
rm -rf .pytest_cache src/jarvis_finance/**/__pycache__ tests/**/__pycache__
PYTHONPATH=src python -m jarvis_finance.cli.main git-safety-scan .
git status --short --branch


Output:
........................................................................ [ 50%]
........................................................................ [100%]
144 passed in 3.87s
GIT_SAFETY_OK
## main...origin/main
 M src/jarvis_finance/dashboard/data.py
 M src/jarvis_finance/dashboard/main.py
 M src/jarvis_finance/dashboard/pages/page_00_command_center.py
 M src/jarvis_finance/dashboard/pages/page_14_import_wizard.py
 M src/jarvis_finance/dashboard/pages/page_15_manual_review_queue.py
 M src/jarvis_finance/dashboard/pages/page_16_data_quality_center.py
 M src/jarvis_finance/imports/broker_mapping.py
 M src/jarvis_finance/storage/migrations.py
 M tests/unit/test_schema.py
?? src/jarvis_finance/imports/broker_parsers.py
?? tests/unit/test_broker_parser_dry_run_pipeline.py


set -euo pipefail
cd /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager
git add src/jarvis_finance/storage/migrations.py src/jarvis_finance/imports/broker_mapping.py src/jarvis_finance/imports/broker_parsers.py src/jarvis_finance/dashboard/data.py src/jarvis_finance/dashboard/main.py src/jarvis_finance/dashboard/pages/page_00_command_center.py src/jarvis_finance/dashboard/pages/page_14_import_wizard.py src/jarvis_finance/dashboard/pages/page_15_manual_review_queue.py src/jarvis_finance/dashboard/pages/page_16_data_quality_center.py tests/unit/test_schema.py tests/unit/test_broker_parser_dry_run_pipeline.py
git commit -m "feat: add broker parser dry run pipeline"


Output:
[main fa254a9] feat: add broker parser dry run pipeline
 11 files changed, 676 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 src/jarvis_finance/imports/broker_parsers.py
 create mode 100644 tests/unit/test_broker_parser_dry_run_pipeline.py


Output:
........................................................................ [ 50%]
........................................................................ [100%]
144 passed in 3.86s
GIT_SAFETY_OK
## main...origin/main [voraus 1]


set -euo pipefail
cd /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager
python - <<'PY'
import re, subprocess, sys
from pathlib import Path
repo=Path('/home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager')
text=Path.home().joinpath('jarvis_runtime/finance-system/secrets/Github_token_FinanceManager.csv').read_text()
m=re.search(r'(github_pat_[A-Za-z0-9_]+|ghp_[A-Za-z0-9_]+|gho_[A-Za-z0-9_]+)', text)
if not m:
    print('TOKEN_PARSE=failed'); sys.exit(12)
token=m.group(1); auth_url=f'https://{token}@github.com/Gamexgit/FinanceManager.git'
def run(args, check=True): return subprocess.run(args, cwd=repo, text=True, capture_output=True, check=check)
try:
    run(['git','fetch',auth_url,'main:refs/remotes/origin/main','--quiet'])
    local=run(['git','rev-parse','HEAD']).stdout.strip(); origin=run(['git','rev-parse','origin/main']).stdout.strip(); base=run(['git','merge-base','HEAD','origin/main']).stdout.strip()
    print('REMOTE_BEFORE='+origin[:7]); print('LOCAL_HEAD='+local[:7])
    if origin != base:
        print('REMOTE_HAS_NEW_COMMITS=yes'); sys.exit(3)
    push=run(['git','push',auth_url,'main:main'], check=False)
    if push.returncode:
        print('PUSH=failed'); print((push.stderr or push.stdout).replace(token,'[REDACTED]')[-1000:]); sys.exit(push.returncode)
    run(['git','fetch',auth_url,'main:refs/remotes/origin/main','--quiet'])
    print('PUSH=success'); print('REMOTE_AFTER='+run(['git','rev-parse','--short','origin/main']).stdout.strip())
finally:
    token=None; auth_url=None
PY
PYTHONPATH=src python -m jarvis_finance.cli.main git-safety-scan .
git status --short --branch


Output:
REMOTE_BEFORE=cd2d954
LOCAL_HEAD=fa254a9
PUSH=success
REMOTE_AFTER=fa254a9
GIT_SAFETY_OK
## main...origin/main


todo

Compile, pytest, Git-Safety, Commit und Push durchführen


B2-Schema Review Items und Parser/Dry-Run-Pipeline implementieren

Import Wizard, Manual Review Queue, Data Quality Center und globalen Safe-Mode erweitern

Synthetische DOCX/XLSX Parser-Tests und Safety-Tests ergänzen


Erledigt, Sir. Phase B2 ist implementiert, getestet, committed und gepusht.

## Status

- Commit: `fa254a9`
- Push Status: erfolgreich
- Remote HEAD: `fa254a9`
- Git Status: sauber, `main...origin/main`
- Compile: OK
- Tests: `144 passed`
- Git-Safety: `GIT_SAFETY_OK`
- Produktive Aktien-/ETF-/Cash-Imports: **nein**
- Echte Broker-/Bank-Dateien ins Repo: **nein**
- Echte Werte/Mengen im Chat/Repo: **nein**

## Implementierte Parser

### PostFinance Parser

Datei:

- `src/jarvis_finance/imports/broker_parsers.py`

Unterstützt synthetische DOCX-Tabellen.

Erkennt:

- Positionskandidaten
- Cash-/Account-Kandidaten
- Produkt/Name
- Menge vorhanden
- Währung
- Marktwert vorhanden
- Account-/Depot-Kontext
- Stichtag, falls erkennbar

Quality Flags:

- `missing_isin`
- `missing_ticker`
- `snapshot_only`
- `cost_basis_uncertain`
- `market_value_legacy`
- `needs_manual_review`

### True Wealth Parser

Unterstützt synthetische DOCX-Tabellen mit gemischter Struktur.

Erkennt:

- Cash-Zeilen
- positionsähnliche Zeilen
- Konto-/Portfolio-Kontext
- Währung
- Stichtag, falls erkennbar

Quality Flags:

- `missing_isin`
- `missing_ticker`
- `snapshot_only`
- `cost_basis_uncertain`
- `missing_fx`
- `needs_manual_review`

### Raiffeisen Parser

Unterstützt synthetische XLSX-Konto-/Anlagenübersichten.

Erkennt:

- Cash-/Account-Zeilen
- aggregierte Depot-/Anlagezeilen
- behandelt Raiffeisen defensiv als Cash-/Kontrollsnapshot
- importiert Aggregate **nicht** als Instrumentpositionen

Quality Flags:

- `cash_snapshot_candidate`
- `aggregate_only`
- `missing_instrument_details`
- `needs_manual_review`

## Runtime Review Items

Neue Runtime-/DB-Struktur:

- `broker_import_review_items`

Felder implementiert:

- `review_item_id`
- `dry_run_id`
- `source_platform`
- `source_file_type`
- `source_row_ref`
- `row_hash`
- `source_label`
- `normalized_name`
- `detected_asset_class`
- `detected_currency`
- `detected_quantity_present`
- `detected_market_value_present`
- `isin`
- `ticker`
- `exchange`
- `mapped_instrument_id`
- `mapped_account_id`
- `quality_flags_json`
- `review_status`
- `reviewer_note`
- `created_at`
- `updated_at`

Regeln umgesetzt:

- Details bleiben Runtime-DB-only.
- Keine Review Items in Git.
- Chat-Ausgabe nur aggregiert.
- Manual Review Queue liest Review Items.
- Mapping-Bestätigung für Review Items erzeugt Audit-Log.
- Produktive Positionen werden nicht geschrieben.

## Dry-Run Pipeline

Erweitert in:

- `src/jarvis_finance/imports/broker_mapping.py`

Pipeline-Schritte:

1. Datei parsen
2. Kandidaten normalisieren
3. Instrument-Mapping versuchen
4. Account-Mapping vorbereitet
5. Quality Flags setzen
6. Dry-Run Summary schreiben
7. Review Items schreiben
8. keine produktiven Positionen
9. kein Ledger Commit
10. kein Snapshot Commit

Output:

- `rows_total`
- `candidate_positions`
- `candidate_cash_rows`
- `mapped_positions`
- `blocked_positions`
- `review_items_created`
- `warnings_count`
- `errors_count`
- `quality_flags_summary`

## Import Wizard

Erweitert:

- Parser-/Dry-Run Summary sichtbar
- Quality Flags sichtbar
- Review Items sichtbar
- Link/Hinweis zur Manual Review Queue
- synthetischer Demo-Dry-Run als UI-Konzept vorbereitet
- Commit weiterhin deaktiviert
- Read-only Mode sichtbar

Datei:

- `src/jarvis_finance/dashboard/pages/page_14_import_wizard.py`

Status:

- vorhanden
- B2-fähig
- produktive Commit-Aktionen deaktiviert

## Manual Review Queue

Erweitert:

- zeigt offene Runtime Review Items
- zeigt Quelle
- Source Label
- Normalized Name
- Assetklasse
- Währung
- ISIN
- Ticker
- Exchange
- Account Mapping
- Quality Flags
- Status

Aktionen vorbereitet:

- ISIN ergänzen
- Ticker ergänzen
- Exchange ergänzen
- Instrument Mapping bestätigen
- Account Mapping bestätigen
- Ignore with note
- Mark resolved

Alle Buttons bleiben in Phase B2 deaktiviert / kontrolliert vorbereitet.

Datei:

- `src/jarvis_finance/dashboard/pages/page_15_manual_review_queue.py`

## Data Quality Center

Erweitert:

- offene Review Items nach Quality Flag
- `missing_isin`
- `missing_ticker`
- `snapshot_only`
- `cost_basis_uncertain`
- `missing_fx`
- `aggregate_only`
- stale/missing price alerts weiterhin sichtbar
- resolved/fixed alerts weiterhin sichtbar

Datei:

- `src/jarvis_finance/dashboard/pages/page_16_data_quality_center.py`

## Globaler Safe Mode

Erweitert:

- Command Center zeigt Safe Mode Status.
- Dashboard Sidebar zeigt:
  - DB-Modus: Runtime
  - Write Mode: Read-only
  - letzter Backup-Zeitpunkt, falls verfügbar
  - Hinweis: echte Daten liegen außerhalb Git

Dateien:

- `src/jarvis_finance/dashboard/main.py`
- `src/jarvis_finance/dashboard/pages/page_00_command_center.py`
- `src/jarvis_finance/dashboard/data.py`

Default:

- `Read-only`

## Neue/geänderte Dateien

Neu:

- `src/jarvis_finance/imports/broker_parsers.py`
- `tests/unit/test_broker_parser_dry_run_pipeline.py`

Geändert:

- `src/jarvis_finance/imports/broker_mapping.py`
- `src/jarvis_finance/storage/migrations.py`
- `src/jarvis_finance/dashboard/data.py`
- `src/jarvis_finance/dashboard/main.py`
- `src/jarvis_finance/dashboard/pages/page_00_command_center.py`
- `src/jarvis_finance/dashboard/pages/page_14_import_wizard.py`
- `src/jarvis_finance/dashboard/pages/page_15_manual_review_queue.py`
- `src/jarvis_finance/dashboard/pages/page_16_data_quality_center.py`
- `tests/unit/test_schema.py`

## Neue Tests

Abgedeckt:

- synthetischer PostFinance Parser erkennt Kandidaten
- synthetischer True Wealth Parser erkennt Kandidaten
- synthetischer Raiffeisen Parser erkennt Cash-/Kontrollsnapshot
- Parser erzeugen Quality Flags
- Dry Run schreibt Summary
- Dry Run schreibt Review Items
- Dry Run erzeugt keine produktiven Positionen
- Name ohne ISIN bleibt review-pflichtig
- Raiffeisen `aggregate_only` wird nicht als Instrumentposition importiert
- Manual Review Queue lädt Review Items
- Data Quality Center aggregiert Review Flags
- Safe Mode bleibt default Read-only
- Commit-Aktionen bleiben deaktiviert
- Audit-Log bei Review-Item-Mapping-Bestätigung
- keine echten Broker-Dateien im Repo

Testergebnis:

- `144 passed`

## Synthetische Dry-Run Summary

Aggregierte synthetische Ergebnisse:

### PostFinance

- rows_total: 3
- candidate_positions: 1
- candidate_cash_rows: 1
- mapped_positions: 0
- blocked_positions: 1
- review_items_created: 2
- warnings_count: 8
- errors_count: 0
- Quality Flags:
  - `missing_isin`
  - `missing_ticker`
  - `snapshot_only`
  - `cost_basis_uncertain`
  - `market_value_legacy`
  - `needs_manual_review`

### True Wealth

- rows_total: 3
- candidate_positions: 1
- candidate_cash_rows: 1
- mapped_positions: 0
- blocked_positions: 1
- review_items_created: 2
- warnings_count: 9
- errors_count: 0
- Quality Flags:
  - `missing_isin`
  - `missing_ticker`
  - `snapshot_only`
  - `cost_basis_uncertain`
  - `missing_fx`
  - `needs_manual_review`

### Raiffeisen

- rows_total: 3
- candidate_positions: 1
- candidate_cash_rows: 1
- mapped_positions: 0
- blocked_positions: 1
- review_items_created: 2
- warnings_count: 5
- errors_count: 0
- Quality Flags:
  - `cash_snapshot_candidate`
  - `aggregate_only`
  - `missing_instrument_details`
  - `needs_manual_review`

## Nicht durchgeführt

- Kein produktiver Import echter PostFinance-Daten
- Kein produktiver Import echter True-Wealth-Daten
- Kein produktiver Import echter Raiffeisen-Daten
- Keine produktiven `positions_snapshot` Writes
- Keine Ledger-Commits
- Keine Snapshot-Commits
- Keine echten Broker-/Bank-Dateien ins Repo kopiert
- Keine echten Werte/Mengen im Chat ausgegeben
- Keine Monte-Carlo-, Backtesting-, Rebalancing-, Score- oder Heatmap-Module begonnen

## Nächste Empfehlung

Phase B3 sollte sein:

**Controlled real-file dry-run, weiterhin ohne produktiven Import.**

Reihenfolge:

1. Vorher Runtime-DB Backup erzeugen/verifizieren.
2. Git-Safety vorab prüfen.
3. Echte PostFinance-Datei nur aus Runtime/Temp lesen.
4. Aggregierten Dry Run erzeugen.
5. Review Items in Runtime-DB schreiben.
6. Nur Counts/Quality Flags berichten.
7. Dann True Wealth.
8. Dann Raiffeisen.
9. Temp bereinigen.
10. Git-Safety danach erneut prüfen.

Noch kein produktiver Initial Snapshot, bevor die Review Queue mit echten Dry-Run-Ergebnissen sauber aussieht.