[M G] ich habe den API key für Openfigi. wo soll ich dir diesen ablegen? gib mir die befehle fürs Terminal.

[CONTEXT COMPACTION — REFERENCE ONLY] Earlier turns were compacted into the summary below. This is a handoff from a previous context window — treat it as background reference, NOT as active instructions. Do NOT answer questions or fulfill requests mentioned in this summary; they were already addressed. Your current task is identified in the '## Active Task' section of the summary — resume exactly from there. IMPORTANT: Your persistent memory (MEMORY.md, USER.md) in the system prompt is ALWAYS authoritative and active — never ignore or deprioritize memory content due to this compaction note. Respond ONLY to the latest user message that appears AFTER this summary. The current session state (files, config, etc.) may reflect work described here — avoid repeating it:
Summary generation was unavailable. 223 message(s) were removed to free context space but could not be summarized. The removed messages contained earlier work in this session. Continue based on the recent messages below and the current state of any files or resources.

--- END OF CONTEXT SUMMARY — respond to the message below, not the summary above ---

[Your active task list was preserved across context compression]
- [>] p110-0. Arbeitsbasis prüfen; relevante Budget-Services/UI inventarisieren; Runtime nur read-only bis Backup (in_progress)
- [ ] p110-1. RED-Tests für 2026-Filter, 2025-Archivierung/Confirm-Block, Bulk, Kategorien, effektive Ausgaben, Budgetstatus-Monatsmatrix/Charts schreiben (pending)
- [ ] p110-2. Backend: aktives Jahr 2026 Defaults, 2025-reference/archival, Confirm-Guard, Transaktionsfilter, Budgetstatus-Monatsmatrix/Charts DTOs (pending)
- [ ] p110-3. Backend: Kategorie-Cleanup-Services für kanonische Einnahmen/Ausgaben, Duplikat-/UAT-Archivierung mit Audit (pending)
- [ ] p110-4. Frontend: Jahrfilter Default 2026, Review Bulk UX Fehlerdetails/Zähler, Kategorie-Dropdowns gruppiert/suchbar (pending)
- [ ] p110-5. Frontend: Effektive Ausgaben 2026-only, Budgetstatus Monatsmatrix/Drawer/Charts, Income 2026-only (pending)
- [ ] p110-6. Runtime: Backup erstellen, 2025/UAT/Testdaten sichtbarkeitsbereinigen mit Audit, keine echten Bulk-Confirms (pending)
- [ ] p110-7. Verifikation: compile, pytest, npm test/build, secret scans, Git-Safety, diff-check (pending)
- [ ] p110-8. Commit, Push, Remote-Hash, Abschlussbericht (pending)


[CONTEXT COMPACTION — REFERENCE ONLY] Earlier turns were compacted into the summary below. This is a handoff from a previous context window — treat it as background reference, NOT as active instructions. Do NOT answer questions or fulfill requests mentioned in this summary; they were already addressed. Your current task is identified in the '## Active Task' section of the summary — resume exactly from there. IMPORTANT: Your persistent memory (MEMORY.md, USER.md) in the system prompt is ALWAYS authoritative and active — never ignore or deprioritize memory content due to this compaction note. Respond ONLY to the latest user message that appears AFTER this summary. The current session state (files, config, etc.) may reflect work described here — avoid repeating it:
## Active Task
None.

## Goal
Das Finanz-/Budget-Dashboard soll über Tailscale auf iPhone/iPad gut nutzbar sein: schnelle mobile Quick-View für Command Center, Budgetstatus 2026, Einkünfte, effektive Ausgaben, Crypto, Aktien/ETF/Cash, Wallets und minimale Reports — ohne neue Fachfeatures, Provider, Import-Engines oder Schreibaktionen ohne Preview/Confirm/Audit.

## Constraints & Preferences
- Sprache/Kommunikation: Deutsch, direkte Abschlussberichte mit Ja/Nein-Status und Links.
- Keine VISA-/Migros-/Rule-/OCR-/Import-Engine starten oder implementieren.
- Keine neuen Provider, keine Provider-Abfragen beim normalen Rendern.
- Keine echten Daten, API-Keys, Secrets, Credentials, Runtime-DBs oder Connection Strings ins Git/Frontend.
- Schreibaktionen nur mit Preview/Confirm/Audit.
- Fokus Mobile UX: responsive Layout, mobile Navigation, kompakte Views, Touch-Bedienbarkeit.
- Desktop-Verhalten darf nicht kaputtgehen; Desktop-Sidebar bleibt.
- Mobile User Mode soll keine Admin-/Debug-/technischen IDs zeigen.
- Große Tabellen mobil entschärfen: Desktop Tabelle, Mobile Card List; horizontales Scrollen nur in Detailbereichen, wenn unvermeidbar.
- Breakpoints: mobile `<640px`, tablet `640–1024px`, desktop `>1024px`.
- Beträge immer mit 2 Dezimalstellen, keine langen Decimal-Werte.
- Roadmap-Hinweise sind erlaubt, aber keine Fake-Buttons.
- Vor Abschluss erwünscht: Python compile, pytest, npm test, npm run build, Secret Scans, Git-Safety, `git diff --check`, Commit, Push, Restart, lokale/Tailscale-Links melden.

## Completed Actions
1. RED-/Inventar-Phase für Vue Mobile UX Sprint v1 durchgeführt — festgestellt, dass mobile Nav/Card-Selektoren fehlen und `AppLayout` ohne Router-Injection fragil ist [tool: tests/inspection].
2. Mobile Navigation umgesetzt — Desktop-Sidebar bleibt erhalten; Mobile erhält Bottom Navigation mit `Home`, `Budget`, `Ausgaben`, `Crypto`, `Portfolio`, `Mehr` [tool: code edit].
3. Mobile „Mehr“-Navigation umgesetzt — enthält `Reports`, `Wallets`, `Einkünfte`, `Kategorien`, `Aktien/ETF & Cash`; dadurch keine 30 Menüpunkte auf iPhone [tool: code edit].
4. Mobile Shell/Layout angepasst — Bottom-Nav-Space und mobiles Padding ergänzt; Desktop-Layout bleibt erhalten [tool: code edit].
5. Command Center mobil optimiert — KPI Cards kompakter gemacht, responsive Umbruch/Padding/Header-Größen angepasst, Werte schneiden mobil nicht ab [tool: code edit].
6. Budgetstatus Mobile Cards umgesetzt — Kategorie-Cards statt breiter Tabelle mit Kategorie, Budget Monat, Ist Monat, Prognose, Abweichung und Ampel/Status [tool: code edit].
7. Desktop-Budgetstatus erhalten — Desktop-Tabelle bleibt sichtbar/weiter nutzbar; Mobile nutzt Cards [tool: code edit].
8. Budgetstatus-Formatierung abgesichert — keine langen Decimal-Werte, Beträge mit 2 Dezimalstellen, keine technischen IDs in Mobile Cards [tool: code edit/tests].
9. Effektive-Ausgaben-Mobile-Ansicht umgesetzt — Card-Liste mit Datum, Beschreibung/Händler, Kategorie, Konto, Betrag prominent und Status [tool: code edit].
10. Effektive-Ausgaben-Roadmap-Hinweis ergänzt — „Beleg erfassen und Foto-Import: später.“ als Coming-soon-Hinweis, nicht als Fake-Button [tool: code edit].
11. Einkünfte mobil nutzbar gemacht — Mobile Card-Ansicht für Einkünfte-Pläne mit Name, Quelle/Person, Art, Monatswert, Jahreswert, Status und Archivieren-Aktion wenn aktiv [tool: code edit].
12. Crypto mobil nutzbar gemacht — Coin-Liste als Mobile Cards, Desktop-Tabelle ab `md`, Detail Drawer bleibt nutzbar [tool: code edit].
13. Aktien/ETF/Cash mobil nutzbar gemacht — Aktien/ETF-Positionen als Mobile Cards ergänzt; Cash kompakt belassen; Status/Detail-Nutzung mobil verbessert [tool: code edit].
14. Wallets mobil nutzbar gemacht — Wallet-Liste als Cards ergänzt [tool: code edit].
15. Große Tabellen mobil entschärft — relevante Tabellen werden auf Mobile durch Card Lists ersetzt oder erst ab `md`/Desktop angezeigt [tool: code edit].
16. `DetailDrawer` mobil verbessert — auf Mobile Bottom-Sheet/fullscreen-artiges Panel mit besser erreichbarem Schließen-Button [tool: code edit].
17. Touch-Bedienbarkeit verbessert — wichtige Mobile Buttons/Cards mit größeren Touch-Flächen; keine Hover-only Mobile-Flows [tool: code edit].
18. Neue/aktualisierte Frontend-Tests ergänzt — prüfen mobile Navigation, Desktop Sidebar, Mobile Shell, Budgetstatus Cards, Effektive-Ausgaben Cards, Crypto Cards, Equity Cards, Dezimalformatierung und technische-ID-Vermeidung [tool: test/code edit].
19. Frontend Vitest ausgeführt — Ergebnis: `31 passed` [tool: terminal].
20. Frontend Build ausgeführt — Ergebnis: OK [tool: terminal].
21. Python compile ausgeführt — Ergebnis: OK [tool: terminal].
22. Backend pytest ausgeführt — Ergebnis: `393 passed` [tool: terminal].
23. `git diff --check` ausgeführt — Ergebnis: OK [tool: terminal].
24. Source Secret Scan ausgeführt — Ergebnis: OK; keine Secrets gefunden/preserviert [tool: terminal].
25. Frontend Build Secret Scan ausgeführt — Ergebnis: OK [tool: terminal].
26. Git-Safety geprüft — Ergebnis: OK [tool: terminal].
27. Browser-/Route-Sanity durchgeführt — Routen `/`, `/planning/budget/status`, `/planning/budget/income`, `/planning/budget/expenses/actual`, `/crypto`, `/equity`, `/wallets` jeweils `200` [tool: browser/terminal].
28. Einschränkung bei echtem iPhone-Viewport-Test dokumentiert — Browser-Stack hatte keinen Viewport-Resize/Device-Emulation-Hebel; Playwright/Selenium lokal nicht installiert; Absicherung daher über responsive Klassen und Vitest-Assertions [tool: inspection].
29. Dashboard aus aktuellem Working Tree neu gestartet — Backend und Frontend neu gestartet [tool: terminal].
30. Healthchecks durchgeführt — Backend `/api/health`: `200`; Frontend lokal: `200`; Frontend via Tailscale-IP: `200` [tool: terminal].
31. Commit erstellt — Commit Message: `feat: improve mobile dashboard ux`; Commit Hash: `3f2189fd7c0fed01fd4b99f11e0a2ca61bb1cd00` [tool: git].
32. Push durchgeführt und Remote-Hash verifiziert — Remote Hash entspricht lokalem Commit `3f2189fd7c0fed01fd4b99f11e0a2ca61bb1cd00`; Push erfolgreich [tool: git].
33. Finaler Restart aus gepushtem Stand durchgeführt — Backend PID `504937`, Frontend PID `504946` [tool: terminal].
34. Abschlussbericht geliefert — Ja/Nein-Status für alle geforderten Mobile-UX-Bereiche, Tests, Git-Safety, Commit/Push, Links und offene Grenzen gemeldet [tool: response].

## Active State
- Working directory: nicht explizit im neuen Kontext genannt.
- Branch: `feat/budget-phase-1-4`.
- Working Tree: sauber.
- Letzter Commit: `3f2189fd7c0fed01fd4b99f11e0a2ca61bb1cd00`.
- Commit Message: `feat: improve mobile dashboard ux`.
- Push-Status: erfolgreich; Remote-Hash Match: ja.
- Backend läuft neu gestartet mit PID `504937`.
- Frontend läuft neu gestartet mit PID `504946`.
- Lokales Backend: `http://127.0.0.1:8000`.
- Lokales Frontend: `http://127.0.0.1:5173`.
- Tailscale Dashboard: `http://100.85.29.67:5173`.
- Tailscale Serve/HTTPS: nicht aktiv; Meldung: `No serve config`.
- Healthchecks:
  - Backend `/api/health`: `200`.
  - Frontend lokal: `200`.
  - Frontend via Tailscale-IP: `200`.
- Teststatus:
  - Backend pytest: `393 passed`.
  - Frontend Vitest: `31 passed`.
  - Frontend build: OK.
  - Python compile: OK.
  - `git diff --check`: OK.
  - Source Secret Scan: OK.
  - Frontend Build Secret Scan: OK.
  - Git-Safety: OK.
- Modified/created files: konkrete Dateiliste wurde im sichtbaren Verlauf nicht genannt; Änderungen betreffen Vue Layout-/Navigations-/Dashboard-/Budget-/Expense-/Income-/Crypto-/Equity-/Wallet-/DetailDrawer-Komponenten und zugehörige Frontend-Tests.

## In Progress
Keine laufende Arbeit. Vue Mobile UX Sprint v1 wurde abgeschlossen, getestet, committed, gepusht und neu gestartet.

## Blocked
- Kein echter iPhone-Safari-/390px-Viewport-Test mit Playwright/Selenium möglich, weil Playwright/Selenium lokal nicht installiert sind und der verfügbare Browser-Stack keinen Viewport-Resize-/Device-Emulation-Hebel bot.
- Tailscale Serve/HTTPS ist nicht aktiv; Status/Meldung: `No serve config`.
- Keine funktionalen Blocker für die ausgelieferte Mobile UX bekannt.

## Key Decisions
- Mobile Navigation als Bottom Navigation plus leichtgewichtiges `details`-Mehr-Menü umgesetzt, statt komplexes Drawer-System: pragmatisch, robust und ausreichend für unterwegs.
- Desktop-Sidebar beibehalten, um vorhandenes Desktop-Verhalten nicht zu brechen.
- Mobile Quick-View priorisiert statt Desktop-Tabellen 1:1 auf iPhone zu pressen.
- Große Tabellen mobil durch Card Lists ersetzt; Desktop-Tabellen bleiben ab passenden Breakpoints erhalten.
- Keine neuen Fachmodule/Provider/Import-Engines implementiert, um Scope und Sicherheitsvorgaben einzuhalten.
- Keine Fake-Buttons für OCR/Foto/Beleg-Erfassung; stattdessen Coming-soon-Hinweis.
- Echten Viewport-Test nicht durch neue Testdependency ersetzt; stattdessen responsive Klassen + Vitest-Assertions + reale Route-Sanity verwendet, um keine unnötigen Dependencies einzuführen.
- Detail Drawer mobil als Bottom Sheet/fullscreen-artiges Panel verbessert, weil Touch-Bedienbarkeit und Sichtbarkeit auf iPhone wichtiger sind als Desktop-ähnliche Side Panels.

## Resolved Questions
- Mobile Navigation umgesetzt? Ja: Bottom Navigation mit Home, Budget, Ausgaben, Crypto, Portfolio, Mehr; Mehr enthält Reports, Wallets, Einkünfte, Kategorien, Aktien/ETF & Cash.
- Command Center mobil nutzbar? Ja: kompaktere KPI Cards, reduzierte Header/Padding, saubere Wertumbrüche.
- Budgetstatus mobil als Cards? Ja: Kategorie-Cards mit Budget Monat, Ist Monat, Prognose, Abweichung und Ampel/Status.
- Effektive Ausgaben mobil nutzbar? Ja: Card-Liste mit Datum, Händler/Beschreibung, Kategorie, Konto, Betrag und Status; Coming-soon-Hinweis für Beleg/Foto.
- Einkünfte mobil nutzbar? Ja: Cards mit Name, Quelle/Person, Art, Monatswert, Jahreswert, Status.
- Crypto mobil nutzbar? Ja: Coin Cards, kompakte Liste, Details nutzbar.
- Aktien/ETF/Cash mobil nutzbar? Ja: Positionen als Cards, Cash kompakt, Detail Drawer verbessert.
- Wallets mobil nutzbar? Ja: Wallet Cards.
- Tabellen mobil entschärft? Ja: Mobile Card Lists oder Desktop-only Tabellen.
- Tailscale-Link funktioniert? Ja: `http://100.85.29.67:5173` liefert `200`.
- Backend neu gestartet? Ja, PID `504937`.
- Frontend neu gestartet? Ja, PID `504946`.
- Commit/Push erledigt? Ja, Commit/Remote Hash `3f2189fd7c0fed01fd4b99f11e0a2ca61bb1cd00`.
- Wurden VISA/Migros/OCR/Rule/Duplicate/neue Provider implementiert oder gestartet? Nein.

## Pending User Asks
None.

## Relevant Files
- Konkrete Pfade wurden im sichtbaren Verlauf nicht ausgegeben.
- Relevante geänderte Bereiche:
  - Vue App Layout / Shell: Mobile Padding, Bottom Navigation, Desktop Sidebar-Erhalt.
  - Mobile Navigation-Komponenten: Hauptpunkte und Mehr-Menü.
  - Command Center Dashboard-Komponenten: responsive KPI Cards.
  - Budgetstatus-Komponenten: Desktop-Tabelle plus Mobile Category Cards.
  - Effektive-Ausgaben-Komponenten: Mobile Expense Cards und Coming-soon-Hinweis.
  - Einkünfte-Komponenten: Mobile Income Plan Cards.
  - Crypto-Komponenten: Mobile Coin Cards, Desktop-Tabelle ab `md`.
  - Equity/Aktien-ETF-Cash-Komponenten: Mobile Position Cards.
  - Wallet-Komponenten: Mobile Wallet Cards.
  - `DetailDrawer`-ähnliche Komponente: Mobile Bottom-Sheet/fullscreen-artiges Verhalten.
  - Frontend-Testdateien: Vitest-Abdeckung für Mobile Navigation, Cards, Layout, Dezimalformatierung und technische-ID-Vermeidung.

## Remaining Work
- Optional bei späterem Bedarf: echten iPhone/iPad-Viewport-Test mit Playwright/Selenium oder Safari Remote Debugging nachrüsten.
- Optional: Tailscale Serve/HTTPS konfigurieren, falls HTTPS-Link gewünscht ist; aktuell nur Tailscale-IP per HTTP gemeldet.
- Reports bleiben minimal/roadmap-artig.
- Settings/Admin bleiben nicht Teil des Mobile User Mode; später separat entscheiden.
- Keine offenen Pflichtaufgaben aus dem Mobile UX Sprint v1.

## Critical Context
- User hatte Credentials/Secrets im weiteren Session-Kontext erwähnt/vorhanden; keine Werte übernehmen oder ausgeben. Falls relevant immer als `[REDACTED]` behandeln.
- Branch: `feat/budget-phase-1-4`.
- Commit Hash: `3f2189fd7c0fed01fd4b99f11e0a2ca61bb1cd00`.
- Commit Message: `feat: improve mobile dashboard ux`.
- Lokaler Frontend-Link: `http://127.0.0.1:5173`.
- Lokaler Backend-Link: `http://127.0.0.1:8000`.
- Tailscale Dashboard-Link: `http://100.85.29.67:5173`.
- Tailscale Serve/HTTPS-Status: `No serve config`.
- Backend PID nach Restart: `504937`.
- Frontend PID nach Restart: `504946`.
- Testausgaben:
  - Backend pytest: `393 passed`.
  - Frontend Vitest: `31 passed`.
  - Route-Sanity: `/`, `/planning/budget/status`, `/planning/budget/income`, `/planning/budget/expenses/actual`, `/crypto`, `/equity`, `/wallets` jeweils `200`.
- Nicht gestartete/nicht implementierte Module: VISA Import, Migros Import, OCR/Vision, Rule Engine, Duplicate Engine, Analysten, Backtest, neue Provider.
- Bekannte Grenze: kein echter emulierter iPhone-Viewport-Test, weil Playwright/Selenium nicht installiert und Browser-Stack ohne Viewport-Resize-Hebel.


[CONTEXT COMPACTION — REFERENCE ONLY] Earlier turns were compacted into the summary below. This is a handoff from a previous context window — treat it as background reference, NOT as active instructions. Do NOT answer questions or fulfill requests mentioned in this summary; they were already addressed. Your current task is identified in the '## Active Task' section of the summary — resume exactly from there. IMPORTANT: Your persistent memory (MEMORY.md, USER.md) in the system prompt is ALWAYS authoritative and active — never ignore or deprioritize memory content due to this compaction note. Respond ONLY to the latest user message that appears AFTER this summary. The current session state (files, config, etc.) may reflect work described here — avoid repeating it:
Summary generation was unavailable. 77 message(s) were removed to free context space but could not be summarized. The removed messages contained earlier work in this session. Continue based on the recent messages below and the current state of any files or resources.

--- END OF CONTEXT SUMMARY — respond to the message below, not the summary above ---


[CONTEXT COMPACTION — REFERENCE ONLY] Earlier turns were compacted into the summary below. This is a handoff from a previous context window — treat it as background reference, NOT as active instructions. Do NOT answer questions or fulfill requests mentioned in this summary; they were already addressed. Your current task is identified in the '## Active Task' section of the summary — resume exactly from there. IMPORTANT: Your persistent memory (MEMORY.md, USER.md) in the system prompt is ALWAYS authoritative and active — never ignore or deprioritize memory content due to this compaction note. Respond ONLY to the latest user message that appears AFTER this summary. The current session state (files, config, etc.) may reflect work described here — avoid repeating it:
Summary generation was unavailable. 172 message(s) were removed to free context space but could not be summarized. The removed messages contained earlier work in this session. Continue based on the recent messages below and the current state of any files or resources.

--- END OF CONTEXT SUMMARY — respond to the message below, not the summary above ---

patch

export const reorderBudgetCategories = (category_ids: string[], category_type: 'expense' | 'income' = 'expense') => apiPost<BudgetConfirm & { updated_count: number }>('/api/budget/categories/reorder',...[truncated]

export const reorderBudgetCategories = (category_ids: string[]) => apiPost<BudgetConfirm & { updated_count: number }>('/api/budget/categories/reorder', { category_ids })


[patch] replace in /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/frontend/src/api/budget.ts (1,875 chars result)


<template>

Setup · Kategorien

      <h1 class="mt-2 text-3xl font-semibold text-slate-...[truncated]

Explanation:
**Considering page update**

I need to think about how to overwrite the categories page. It’s a straightforward task, but I want to make sure I'm thorough and not miss any details. I’ll have to check what changes are necessary and how it might affect the overall structure. It’s best to approach this step by step to avoid any confusion later on. Okay, let’s make sure I'm clear about what needs to be updated!


No linter for .vue files


import { archiveIncomePlan, confirmBudgetTransaction, confirmIncomePlan, confirmIncomePlanUpdate, confirmIncomeTemplates, getBudgetAccounts, getBudgetCategories, getBudgetTransactions, getIncomePlans,...[truncated]


[patch] replace in /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/frontend/src/pages/BudgetIncomePage.vue (1,649 chars result)


Geplante Einkünfte

Planwerte, Monatsdurchschnitt und Ist-Abgle...[truncated]


[patch] replace in /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/frontend/src/pages/BudgetIncomePage.vue (2,038 chars result)


<div class="mt-3 grid grid-cols-2 gap-2"><button class="min-h-11 rounded-lg border border-slate-300 px-3 py-2 text-sm" data-testid="income-plan-up" @click="moveIncomePlan(plan.plan_item_id...[truncated]

<div class="mt-3 grid grid-cols-2 gap-2"><button class="min-h-11 rounded-lg border border-cyan-600 px-3 py-2 text-sm font-semibold text-cyan-800" @click="startEdit(plan)">Planwert bearbeit...[truncated]


[patch] replace in /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/frontend/src/pages/BudgetIncomePage.vue (5,834 chars result)


Explanation:
**Considering patch table details**

I realize I need a header for the patch table and actions associated with it. It's crucial to ensure those elements are clearly defined to provide context. I should think about what specific information will be helpful to include in the header. Maybe something simple, like "Patch ID" and "Action Taken," would work well. I'll just need to figure out the exact actions to reference under that header to ensure everything is clear and well-organized.


[patch] replace in /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/frontend/src/pages/BudgetIncomePage.vue (5,956 chars result)


<button class="rounded-lg border px-2 py-1 text-xs" data-testid="income-plan-up" @click="move...[truncated]

Explanation:
**Addressing column issues**

It looks like I’ve got a problem with the patch; the first TD is still labeled as "name" under the Reihenfolge column. I think I need to be more careful with this. Maybe I should build it out properly and add functions to ensure everything lines up correctly. Getting these details right is important for clarity, and I want to make sure it works as expected. Let's sort this out!


[patch] replace in /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/frontend/src/pages/BudgetIncomePage.vue (6,289 chars result)


Stammdaten
<div class="mt-3 grid gap-3 md:g...[truncated]

<div class="mt-4 grid gap-3"><label class="text-sm font-semibold">Typ/Periodizität<select v-model="editForm.cadence" class="field mt-1"><option value="monthly">monatlich</option><option value="a...[truncated]


[patch] replace in /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/frontend/src/pages/BudgetIncomePage.vue (5,718 chars result)


async function archive(id: string) { await archiveIncomePlan(id); message.value = 'Einkunft archiviert.'; await load() }
function moveIncomePlan(id: string, delta: number) { const ids = plans.value.ma...[truncated]

async function archive(id: string) { await archiveIncomePlan(id); message.value = 'Einkunft archiviert.'; await load() }
onMounted(async () => { try { await load() } catch (e) { error.value = e instan...[truncated]


[patch] replace in /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/frontend/src/pages/BudgetIncomePage.vue (1,850 chars result)


Explanation:
**Updating frontend tests**

I need to update the frontend tests by importing the necessary mocks. It's crucial to make sure everything is set up properly for the tests to run smoothly. Additionally, I'll be adding a categories test to ensure that all aspects are covered. I'm thinking through how to best structure this update and make sure that everything functions as expected. It's all about making the testing process efficient and thorough!


[patch] replace in /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/frontend/src/pages/BudgetIncomePage.test.ts (1,432 chars result)


  archiveIncomePlan: vi.fn(),
  reorderIncomePlans: vi.fn()


[patch] replace in /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/frontend/src/pages/BudgetIncomePage.test.ts (1,243 chars result)


  vi.mocked(archiveIncomePlan).mockResolvedValue({ status: 'archived', entity_id: 'p1', audit_id: 'audit4', message: 'archived' } as any)
  vi.mocked(reorderIncomePlans).mockResolvedValue({ status: 'r...[truncated]


[patch] replace in /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/frontend/src/pages/BudgetIncomePage.test.ts (1,183 chars result)


    expect(wrapper.get('[data-testid="income-edit-panel"]').text()).toContain('Planwert bearbeiten')
    expect(wrapper.get('[data-testid="income-edit-panel"]').text()).toContain('Stammdaten')
    exp...[truncated]


[patch] replace in /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/frontend/src/pages/BudgetIncomePage.test.ts (1,177 chars result)


  it('saves planned income order with explicit audit API', async () => {
    const wrapper = mount(BudgetIncomePage)
    await flushPromises()
    expect(wrapper.get('[data-testid="income-save-order"]...[truncated]

it('adds and archives income through explicit preview/confirm/audit APIs', async () => {


[patch] replace in /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/frontend/src/pages/BudgetIncomePage.test.ts (1,171 chars result)


import { mount, flushPromises } from '@vue/test-utils'
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from 'vitest'
import BudgetCategoriesPage from './BudgetCategoriesPage.vue'
import { getBudgetCat...[truncated]


[write_file] wrote to /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/frontend/src/pages/BudgetCategoriesPage.test.ts (72 lines)


terminal

npm test -- --run src/pages/BudgetCategoriesPage.test.ts src/pages/BudgetIncomePage.test.ts


[terminal] ran `npm test -- --run src/pages/BudgetCategoriesPage.test.ts src/pages/BudgetInco...` -> exit 0, 1 lines output


Frontend-Zieltests sind grün. Ich prüfe jetzt den gesamten Backend-Testlauf, weil Migration/Plan-Sortierung Querschnitt ist.

set -euo pipefail
cd /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager
source ~/jarvis_runtime/finance-system/venv/bin/activate
unset JARVIS_FINANCE_DB_PATH
PYTHONPATH=src python -m compileall -q src tests
PYTHONPATH=src pytest -q


[terminal] ran `set -euo pipefail
cd /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager
source ~/jarvis...` -> exit 1, 1 lines output


Full pytest zeigt nur erwartete Schema-Version-Assertions (`27 → 28`). Ich aktualisiere die Tests auf die neue append-only Migration.

from pathlib import Path
base=Path('/home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/tests/unit')
for rel in ['test_budget_phase1.py','test_budget_phase11.py','test_budget_phase12_seed_review.py','test_budget_phase16_user_rules.py','test_schema.py']:
    p=base/rel
    s=p.read_text()
    s=s.replace('get_schema_version(conn) == 27','get_schema_version(conn) == 28')
    p.write_text(s)
print('updated schema version tests')

Explanation:
**Considering migration options**

I'm wondering whether I should update tests or avoid a schema version bump. It seems like bumping the version would require tests, but the user mentioned an append-only migration. I’m thinking that maybe updating the version and tests would be an acceptable approach, but I need to search for exact requirements to ensure I'm on the right track. It feels like there's a balance to strike here.


Output: updated schema version tests


set -euo pipefail
cd /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager
source ~/jarvis_runtime/finance-system/venv/bin/activate
unset JARVIS_FINANCE_DB_PATH
PYTHONPATH=src pytest -q


[terminal] ran `set -euo pipefail
cd /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager
source ~/jarvis...` -> exit 0, 1 lines output


Backend komplett grün: `442 passed`. Ich lasse jetzt Frontend komplett laufen und baue.

set -euo pipefail
npm test -- --run
npm run build


[terminal] ran `set -euo pipefail
npm test -- --run
npm run build` -> exit 1, 1 lines output


Frontend-Full-Test zeigt zwei Legacy-Text-Erwartungen. Ich erhalte die bekannten UX-Ankertexte zusätzlich, ohne alte Vermischung zurückzubringen.

patch

Kategoriebaum verwalten: Ausgaben- und Einnahmen-Kategorien sind getrennt. Sortierung und Änderungen werden auditierbar gespeichert.

Explanation:
**Checking text and tags**

I'm looking to fix the text, and it seems like I need to check why "Supermarkt" is in there. It could be helpful to add tags to the test next. I really want to make sure everything is clear and well-organized. Maybe inspecting around the test will help clarify what needs attention. I want to ensure everything is in order before moving forward!


[patch] replace in /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/frontend/src/pages/BudgetCategoriesPage.vue (1,162 chars result)


Kategorie-Konsolidierungs-Preview

Merge Preview bleibt bewusst getrennt von der produktiven Expense-Migration.


Found 4 matches for old_string. Provide more context to make it unique, or use replace_all=True.


[read_file] read /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/frontend/src/pages/BudgetCategoriesPage.vue from line 75 (5,183 chars)


[read_file] read /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/frontend/src/pages/BudgetCategoriesPage.vue from line 1 (11,740 chars)


Kategorie-Konsolidierungs-Preview

      <p...[truncated]


[patch] replace in /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/frontend/src/pages/BudgetCategoriesPage.vue (1,676 chars result)


[terminal] ran `npm test -- --run` -> exit 1, 1 lines output


Explanation:
**Evaluating category structure**

I'm considering whether I need child categories. The flatCategories seem to provide only one level of children, but I might think about including children from the root too. It could show the "Supermarkt" as the active child, which seems reasonable. I'm also wondering if I should mock nested children in categories. Since our flat view only includes root and children, I'm looking into the activeRows, which includes sorted children. I need to inspect the snippet further.


[read_file] read /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/frontend/src/pages/BudgetPhase1.test.ts from line 125 (3,189 chars)


[read_file] read /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/frontend/src/pages/BudgetPhase1.test.ts from line 1 (4,976 chars)


[read_file] read /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/frontend/src/pages/BudgetPhase1.test.ts from line 81 (4,389 chars)


Archivierte Kategorien

      <p class="...[truncated]

<section class="rounded-2xl border border-slate-200 bg-white/80 p-5 shadow-sm">

Explanation:
**Implementing archived sections**

I’m thinking about needing to include inactive items, which might not be in the main table, but the test expects them. Should I consider having an archived section for historical details? The requirements suggest separate tables for active items, so maybe I can add archived compact info outside. Also, parent options are only active, so setting value for category 1 seems fine. I definitely need to incorporate Supermarkt and inactive items in this archived section.


Found 2 matches for old_string. Provide more context to make it unique, or use replace_all=True.


Archivierte Kategorien

  ...[truncated]

    </aside>

    <section class="rounded-2xl border border-slate-200 bg-white/80 p-5 shadow-sm">


[patch] replace in /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/frontend/src/pages/BudgetCategoriesPage.vue (1,820 chars result)


const incomeRows = computed(() => activeRows('income'))
const archivedRows = computed(() => flatCategories.value.filter(c => !c.is_active).sort((a, b) => a.name.localeCompare(b.name)))
const parentOpt...[truncated]

const incomeRows = computed(() => activeRows('income'))
const parentOptionsForForm = computed(() => activeRows(form.category_type))


[patch] replace in /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/frontend/src/pages/BudgetCategoriesPage.vue (1,304 chars result)


[terminal] ran `npm test -- --run && npm run build` -> exit 0, 1 lines output


Our neue Archiv-Sektion zeigt historische Kategorien bewusst sichtbar; der Test war zu streng. Ich ändere ihn auf: nicht in normalen Income/Expense-Tabellen, aber Archiv sichtbar.

    expect(expense).not.toContain('Archiv alt')
    expect(income).not.toContain('Archiv alt')
    expect(wrapper.text()).toContain('Archiv alt · inaktiv')

Explanation:
**Troubleshooting build issue**

I'm checking if the exit code is related to a test failure because it seems like "npm run build" was executed. The weird output makes me think the command might have continued unexpectedly. I’m considering how to fix the test, so it doesn't appear in tables, which could be causing the problem. It feels like there could be multiple issues to resolve here; let's dive in further to resolve it!


[patch] replace in /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/frontend/src/pages/BudgetCategoriesPage.test.ts (1,116 chars result)


[Your active task list was preserved across context compression]
- [>] bcux-2. Backend: Category reorder getrennt nach Typ absichern, Dropdown sort_order überall, Income-Plan sort_order Migration/API/Audit (in_progress)
- [ ] bcux-3. Frontend Kategorien & Tags: separate Tables, robuste Up/Down/Desktop Sortierung, CRUD/Archive/Delete UX ohne technische IDs (pending)
- [ ] bcux-4. Frontend Geplante Einkünfte: sortierbare Pläne, bessere Planwert-bearbeiten Dialog/Drawer UX, Audit-gebundene Save-Aktionen (pending)
- [ ] bcux-5. Verifikation: compile, pytest, npm test/build, secret scans, Git-Safety, diff-check (pending)
- [ ] bcux-6. Restart mit Tailscale API-Base, Browser sanity Kategorien/Income/Review/Expenses, Commit, Push, Abschlussbericht (pending)


Ich setze direkt fort: zuerst den aktuellen Arbeitsstand und die Zieltests prüfen, dann vollständige Verifikation.

terminal

set -euo pipefail
cd /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager
printf 'branch=' && git branch --show-current
git status --short

Explanation:
**Continuing the task**

I need to make sure I continue with the task and utilize the necessary tools effectively. It seems like inspecting the current state is a good idea, maybe even run some tests. Skills are already loaded, but I'm wondering about the impact after compaction. I’ll check if we have the content required. I should run `npm` tests/build, especially for the backend, and verify that the code compiles correctly. Let's keep moving forward!


[terminal] ran `set -euo pipefail
cd /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager
printf 'branch=...` -> exit 0, 1 lines output


Ich bin auf dem richtigen Branch. Jetzt lasse ich die Frontend-Zieltests und den Build erneut sauber laufen.

set -euo pipefail
npm test -- --run src/pages/BudgetCategoriesPage.test.ts src/pages/BudgetIncomePage.test.ts
npm run build


[terminal] ran `set -euo pipefail
npm test -- --run src/pages/BudgetCategoriesPage.test.ts sr...` -> exit 1, 1 lines output


Zieltests grün; Build stoppt an einem simplen TypeScript-Unused-Parameter. Ich entferne das sauber.

Explanation:
**Evaluating type parameters**

I'm looking into whether I should fix any unused type parameter for the function rowsFor(type). I see that TypeScript is indicating something at line 94, which usually means there's a potential issue. It could be about how this type is being utilized, so I definitely need to read through the relevant code more thoroughly to understand what’s going on and ensure everything is being used appropriately.


[read_file] read /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/frontend/src/pages/BudgetCategoriesPage.vue from line 86 (3,819 chars)


patch

function applyOrder(type: CategoryType, ids: string[]) { ids.forEach((id, idx) => { const row = flatCategories.value.find(c => c.category_id === id); if (row) row.sort_order = (idx + 1) * 10 }) }
func...[truncated]

function applyOrder(ids: string[]) { ids.forEach((id, idx) => { const row = flatCategories.value.find(c => c.category_id === id); if (row) row.sort_order = (idx + 1) * 10 }) }
function moveCategory(ty...[truncated]


[patch] replace in /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/frontend/src/pages/BudgetCategoriesPage.vue (2,468 chars result)


UI/Backend-Implementierung ist damit abgeschlossen; ich markiere die Sprint-Items und starte die vollständige Verifikation.

todo

Backend: Category reorder getrennt nach Typ absichern, Dropdown sort_order überall, Income-Plan sort_order Migration/API/Audit

Frontend Kategorien & Tags: separate Tables, robuste Up/Down/Desktop Sortierung, CRUD/Archive/Delete UX ohne technische IDs

Frontend Geplante Einkünfte: sortierbare Pläne, bessere Planwert-bearbeiten Dialog/Drawer UX, Audit-gebundene Save-Aktionen

Verifikation: compile, pytest, npm test/build, secret scans, Git-Safety, diff-check


[todo] updated task list


[terminal] ran `set -euo pipefail
cd /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager
source ~/jarvis...` -> exit 0, 1 lines output


Backend-Verifikation grün: `442 passed`. Jetzt vollständiger Frontend-Test plus Build.


[terminal] ran `set -euo pipefail
npm test -- --run
npm run build` -> exit 0, 1 lines output


Frontend komplett grün: `76 passed`, Build OK. Jetzt Secret-Scans, Git-Safety und Diff-Check.

terminal

set -euo pipefail
cd /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager
python - <<'PY'
from pathlib import Path
for p in Path('.').rglob('__pycache__'):
    for f in p.rglob('*'):
        if f.is_file(): f.unl...[truncated]

Explanation:
**Checking scans and sorting**

I need to look into the scans and diff, and I wonder if I've already tested everything. It might be a good idea to inspect the dropdown sort order for all endpoints as well. I should also consider checking the usage of category options for search. There's a lot to do, but it’s important to proceed carefully. I feel a bit secretive about these scans, but I’ll keep everything in order!


[terminal] ran `set -euo pipefail
cd /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager
python - <<'PY'...` -> exit 1, 1 lines output


Der Scan war absichtlich scharf und hat nur Test-/Detector-Strings gefunden (`test_git_safety.py`, `git_safety.py`, pytest-cache), keine echten Secrets. Ich räume Cache und wiederhole mit Allowlist für genau diese Sentinel-Patterns.

set -euo pipefail
cd /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager
rm -rf .pytest_cache frontend/.pytest_cache
python - <<'PY'
from pathlib import Path
patterns = [('github_pat', 'github_pat_'), ('ghp', 'g...[truncated]

Explanation:
**Refining scans for accuracy**

I need to refine the scans to ensure I’m excluding known test code and the quality detector. It’s essential to streamline the process, so I’ll also remove the .pytest_cache. This should help in focusing on the relevant data without any unnecessary clutter. I’m curious about how much this will improve the efficiency of my scans! Let's see if this tweak brings better results.


Output:
source_secret_scan=OK
frontend_build_secret_scan=OK
git_safety_artifacts=OK
git_diff_check=OK


Verifikation grün. Vor dem Runtime-Restart erstelle ich ein Backup, weil die neue append-only Schema-Migration für `sort_order` beim Start greifen kann. Keine produktive Kategorie-Migration, nur Schema-Safety.

todo

Restart mit Tailscale API-Base, Browser sanity Kategorien/Income/Review/Expenses, Commit, Push, Abschlussbericht

Explanation:
**Evaluating migrations and backups**

I need to consider running a specific git safety check and testing my coverage. Updating my to-do list is a must too, then I might need to think about migrations at runtime. The backend restart might apply migrations, especially since we're dealing with a schema migration regarding sort_order. But I want to ensure no silent mutations happen. Since the user mentioned an append-only migration, I think it's wise to back up the database before making any changes. So, I'll make sure to do that before restarting.


terminal

set -euo pipefail
cd /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager
DB="$HOME/jarvis_runtime/finance-system/data/finance.sqlite3"
BACKUP_DIR="$HOME/jarvis_runtime/finance-system/backups/budget_categories_ux...[truncated]


[terminal] ran `set -euo pipefail
cd /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager
DB="$HOME/jarvi...` -> exit 0, 1 lines output


source ~/jarvis_runtime/finance-system/venv/bin/activate
export JARVIS_FINANCE_RUNTIME_DIR=~/jarvis_runtime/finance-system
unset JARVIS_FINANCE_DB_PATH
PYTHONPATH=src uvicorn jarvis_finance.api.main:app --host 0.0.0.0 --port 8000


Output: Background process started


export VITE_API_BASE_URL=http://100.85.29.67:8000
npm run dev -- --host 0.0.0.0 --port 5173


Output: Background process started


Runtime ist neu gestartet. Ich warte auf Healthchecks und prüfe die geforderten Routen per HTTP und Browser.

set -euo pipefail
for i in $(seq 1 40); do
  if curl -fsS http://127.0.0.1:8000/api/health >/dev/null && curl -fsS http://127.0.0.1:5173/ >/dev/null; then break; fi
  sleep 1
  if [ "$i" = 40 ]; then ...[truncated]


[terminal] ran `set -euo pipefail
for i in $(seq 1 40); do
  if curl -fsS http://127.0.0.1:80...` -> exit 0, 1 lines output


[browser_navigate] http://100.85.29.67:5173/planning/budget/categories (8,832 chars)


({hasExpense: document.body.innerText.includes('Ausgaben-Kategorien'), hasIncome: document.body.innerText.includes('Einnahmen-Kategorien'), hasSave: document.body.innerText.includes('Sortierung speichern'), hasNoTechId: !/cat_[a-z0-9]|exp\d|inc\d/.test(document.body.innerText)})


[browser_navigate] http://100.85.29.67:5173/planning/budget/income (8,614 chars)


({hasOrderSave: document.body.innerText.includes('Reihenfolge speichern'), hasEdit: document.body.innerText.includes('Planwert bearbeiten'), hasIncomeDropdownSorted: document.body.innerText.includes('Lohn Marcel') && document.body.innerText.includes('Lohn Melanie'), jsErrors: 0})


({hasMasterData: document.body.innerText.includes('Stammdaten'), hasPlanwert: document.body.innerText.includes('Planwert'), hasStatus: document.body.innerText.includes('Status'), hasReview: document.body.innerText.includes('Zusammenfassung prüfen')})


Explanation:
**Checking click operation**

I think I might have clicked something incorrectly or missed a step. It seems I need a snapshot to double-check. I’m referencing something with e224, but I’m not sure if I actually opened it. It looks like maybe the row I needed is covered, which complicates things. I’ll need to use the snapshot after clicking to clarify what’s going wrong. Let’s make sure I sort this out!


[browser_snapshot] (8,519 chars)


Explanation:
**Troubleshooting panel issues**

Hmm, it looks like the click didn’t open as expected. Maybe the references are stale? I’m seeing that it says there's no panel available. I should consider using the browser console to execute a JavaScript command to click the first button for "Planwert." That could be a better way to trigger it, so I might need to go down that route. Let's try that approach!


({hasMasterData: document.body.innerText.includes('Stammdaten'), hasPlanwertSection: document.body.innerText.includes('Betrag / Monatswert'), hasStatusSection: document.body.innerText.includes('Aktiv / Archiviert'), hasReviewButton: document.body.innerText.includes('Zusammenfassung prüfen')})


[browser_navigate] http://100.85.29.67:5173/planning/budget/expenses/review (6,152 chars)


({hasBulkCategory: document.body.innerText.includes('Bulk-Kategorie'), noJsErrors: true})


[browser_navigate] http://100.85.29.67:5173/planning/budget/expenses/actual (8,609 chars)


({hasCategoryFilter: document.body.innerText.includes('Alle Kategorien'), hasExpenses: document.body.innerText.includes('Effektive Ausgaben'), errors: 0})


Browser-Sanity ist sauber; keine JS-Fehler auf den geprüften Routen. Ich committe und pushe jetzt.

set -euo pipefail
cd /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager
git status --short
if git status --short | grep -E '(^| )[AM?].*(finance\.sqlite3|jarvis_runtime|secrets/|\.env|\.csv|\.xlsx|\.pdf)'; then...[truncated]

Explanation:
**Considering git commit steps**

I think I need to commit, but before I do, it makes sense to inspect the diff first. I'll probably run a git diff summary too. It seems the browser showed actual amounts in the tool output, but the user didn't ask for those in chat. So, no amounts will be included in the final output. I also need to make sure to use my token for memory when pushing the commit. I'll check git status and use askpass for any routines.


[terminal] ran `set -euo pipefail
cd /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager
git status --sh...` -> exit 0, 1 lines output


set -euo pipefail
cd /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager
TOKEN_FILE="$HOME/jarvis_runtime/finance-system/secrets/Github_token_FinanceManager.csv"
ASKPASS=$(mktemp)
cleanup(){ rm -f "$ASKPASS"; }
...[truncated]


[terminal] ran `set -euo pipefail
cd /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager
TOKEN_FILE="$HO...` -> exit 128, 1 lines output


Push ist erfolgt; nur die anschließende Remote-Hash-Prüfung ist am temporären Askpass-Pfad gestolpert. Ich verifiziere den Remote-Hash separat.

set -euo pipefail
cd /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager
TOKEN_FILE="$HOME/jarvis_runtime/finance-system/secrets/Github_token_FinanceManager.csv"
ASKPASS=$(mktemp)
python - "$TOKEN_FILE" "$ASKPAS...[truncated]

Explanation:
**Verifying Git Remote**

I'm noticing that the push succeeded, but the ls-remote failed, possibly due to cleanup or a temporary issue. It seems like the askpass might be needed for git ls-remote, but what if the file is gone? This is all happening within the same shell, which feels odd. I need to verify the remote and consider if askpass is really necessary, especially if it's a public repository. It looks like I need to run the command again.


[terminal] ran `set -euo pipefail
cd /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager
TOKEN_FILE="$HO...` -> exit 0, 1 lines output


[todo] updated task list


## Budget Categories UX Fix Sprint — abgeschlossen

**Branch:** `feat/budget-categories-ux-fix`
**Commit:** `8357392f5a83068f68c4e147ee92f317ec06e37d`
**Push:** ja, Remote-Hash verifiziert
**PR-Link:** https://github.com/Gamexgit/FinanceManager/pull/new/feat/budget-categories-ux-fix

## Ergebnis nach Checkliste

- **Income/Expense Kategorien getrennt:** ja
  `Ausgaben-Kategorien` und `Einnahmen-Kategorien` sind separate Tabellen.

- **Drag & Drop / robuste Sortierung repariert:** ja
  Ich habe bewusst robuste **Up/Down Controls + Speichern** statt fragiler PrimeVue-Drag-Events umgesetzt. Desktop und Mobile nutzbar. Etwas weniger fancy, deutlich weniger Theater — also besser.

- **Expense Dropdown-Reihenfolge korrekt:** ja
  Aktive Expense-Kategorien werden nach `sort_order` geladen; archivierte Kategorien nicht als neue Auswahl.

- **Income Dropdown-Reihenfolge korrekt:** ja
  Aktive Income-Kategorien werden separat nach `sort_order` geladen.

- **Geplante Einkünfte sortierbar:** ja
  `sort_order` für Income-Plans wurde per append-only Migration ergänzt, API + Audit + UI-Speichern umgesetzt.

- **Planwert bearbeiten UX verbessert:** ja
  Drawer/Dialog ist jetzt klar in Sections gegliedert:
  - Stammdaten
  - Planwert
  - Status
  - Review / Zusammenfassung / Speichern

- **Kategorie hinzufügen geprüft:** ja
  Preview → Confirm → Audit bleibt erhalten.

- **Kategorie löschen/archivieren geprüft:** ja
  Leere Kategorien können gelöscht werden; referenzierte Kategorien werden archiviert statt hart gelöscht.

- **Finale Kategorie-Migration ausgeführt:** nein
  Wie befohlen: keine produktive Kategorie-Migration. `Sonstiges / Administration` bleibt reviewpflichtig.

## Safety

- **Keine Fixkosten/Subscriptions:** ja
- **Keine neuen Importquellen:** ja
- **Keine Runtime-DB im Git:** ja
- **Keine echten Daten/Secrets im Git:** ja
- **Keine stillen Kategorie-Mutationen:** ja
- **Kategorieänderungen mit Audit:** ja
- **Runtime-Backup vor Restart/Schema-Migration:** ja
  Backup erstellt unter:
  `/home/agent/jarvis_runtime/finance-system/backups/budget_categories_ux_fix/...`

## Verifikation

- **Python compile:** OK
- **pytest:** `442 passed`
- **npm test:** `76 passed`
- **npm run build:** OK
- **Source Secret Scan:** OK
- **Frontend Build Secret Scan:** OK
- **Git-Safety:** OK
- **git diff --check:** OK
- **Remote-Hash Match:** ja

## Browser Sanity

Geprüft und erreichbar:

- `/planning/budget/categories` → `200`
- `/planning/budget/income` → `200`
- `/planning/budget/expenses/review` → `200`
- `/planning/budget/expenses/actual` → `200`

Zusätzlich geprüft:

- Kategorien-Seite zeigt getrennte Expense/Income-Bereiche.
- Sortierung speichern sichtbar.
- Keine technischen IDs im User-Text.
- Geplante Einkünfte zeigen Sortiercontrols.
- Planwert bearbeiten öffnet mit den neuen Sections.
- Buchungen prüfen und Effektive Ausgaben laden ohne JS-Fehler.

## Laufender Stand

- **Backend PID:** `601750`
- **Frontend PID:** `601786`
- **Dashboard:** `http://100.85.29.67:5173`
- **Backend:** `http://100.85.29.67:8000`

## Offene Punkte

- Keine fachlichen Blocker.
- Die produktive Kategorie-Migration bleibt absichtlich offen, bis du `Sonstiges / Administration` fachlich entscheidest und Confirm freigibst.


[M G] [IMPORTANT: Background process proc_2f013c79eaad matched watch pattern "Local:".
Command: export VITE_API_BASE_URL=http://100.85.29.67:8000
npm run dev -- --host 0.0.0.0 --port 5173
Matched output:
  ➜  Local:   http://localhost:5173/
  ➜  Network: http://192.168.122.42:5173/
  ➜  Network: http://100.85.29.67:5173/]


Das ist wieder eine **alte Watcher-Meldung** von `proc_2f013c79eaad`, nicht der aktuelle Prozess.

Aktueller geprüfter Live-Stand aus dem UX-Fix-Sprint:

- **Branch:** `feat/budget-categories-ux-fix`
- **Commit:** `8357392f5a83068f68c4e147ee92f317ec06e37d`
- **Backend PID:** `601750`
- **Frontend PID:** `601786`
- **Frontend:** `http://100.85.29.67:5173`
- **Backend:** `http://100.85.29.67:8000`

Die Meldung kann ignoriert werden. Alter Frontend-Wächter, neue Paradeuniform.


[M G] Der Budget Categories UX Fix Sprint ist akzeptiert.

Das Zuordnen einzelner Buchungen zu Kategorien funktioniert nun gut. Es fehlt aber noch ein wichtiger Produktivitäts-Workflow:

Wenn mehrere Buchungen ausgewählt und einer Kategorie zugeordnet wurden, sollen diese gemeinsam bestätigt/freigegeben werden können. Aktuell muss man zu viele gleichartige Buchungen einzeln anklicken und bestätigen.

Bitte starte einen kleinen gezielten Sprint:

# Budget Review Bulk Assign & Confirm Fix

Ziel:
In Buchungen prüfen soll Mehrfachauswahl produktiv nutzbar werden: mehrere Kandidaten auswählen, Kategorie zuweisen, optional gemeinsam bestätigen, danach echte Budgettransaktionen erzeugen.

Wichtig:

* Keine neuen Importquellen.
* Keine Fixkosten/Subscriptions.
* Keine Runtime-DB ins Git.
* Keine echten Beträge im Chat.
* Keine automatische Massenbuchung ohne explizites Confirm.
* Preview → Confirm → Audit bleibt Pflicht.
* Fehler pro Kandidat sichtbar machen.
* Sichere Duplikate/covered_by_source weiterhin nicht normal bestätigen.

## 1. Mehrfachauswahl prüfen und reparieren

Auf Seite:

Buchungen prüfen

Bitte sicherstellen:

* Checkbox pro Kandidat sichtbar
* Select All für aktuelle Filteransicht
* Auswahlzähler sichtbar
* ausgewählte Kandidaten bleiben nach Kategoriezuweisung ausgewählt oder es gibt klare Rückmeldung
* Filter/Tabs verlieren Auswahl nicht unerwartet oder zeigen Warnung

## 2. Bulk-Kategorie-Zuweisung

Wenn mehrere Kandidaten ausgewählt sind:

* Kategorie-Dropdown anzeigen
* Button: Kategorie auf Auswahl anwenden
* nach Klick:

  * proposed_category_id für alle ausgewählten Kandidaten setzen
  * proposed_category_name aktualisieren
  * Audit oder Batch-Audit schreiben
  * Toast mit Anzahl aktualisierter Kandidaten
  * UI aktualisiert sich

Wichtig:

* Nur Kandidaten aktualisieren, die noch nicht confirmed sind.
* covered_by_source, auto_ignored_duplicate, superseded nicht normal bearbeiten, außer explizit in Admin/Debug.
* Bei einzelnen Fehlern: Partial Success anzeigen.

## 3. Bulk Confirm nach Kategoriezuweisung

Nach Kategoriezuweisung soll möglich sein:

* Auswahl prüfen
* Button: Auswahl bestätigen
* öffnet Preview/Confirm Dialog
* zeigt:

  * Anzahl Kandidaten
  * Kategorien
  * Quelle(n)
  * mögliche Duplikate
  * Kandidaten ohne Kategorie
  * blockierte Kandidaten
  * Warnungen

Confirm nur aktiv, wenn:

* alle Kandidaten Kategorie haben
* keine sicheren Duplikate darunter sind
* keine covered_by_source darunter sind
* keine transfer_candidate ohne Transfer-Confirm darunter sind
* keine Kandidaten mit fehlenden Pflichtfeldern darunter sind

Nach Confirm:

* für jeden Kandidaten echte budget_transaction erzeugen
* candidate.status = confirmed
* confirmed_transaction_id setzen
* Audit schreiben
* Kandidaten verschwinden aus offener Review
* erscheinen unter Effektive Ausgaben/Einnahmen
* Budgetstatus/Kategorieanalyse/Monatsvergleich aktualisiert sich
* Toast mit Anzahl erfolgreicher Buchungen

## 4. Bulk Confirm für gleichartige Buchungen

Bitte UX so gestalten, dass typische Fälle schnell gehen:

Beispiele:

* mehrere Apple/Google/Netflix Buchungen → Kategorie Elektronische Medien oder Hobbys & Selfcare
* mehrere Restaurant/Kiosk Buchungen → Essen & Haushalt
* mehrere Apothekenbuchungen → Gesundheit
* mehrere Tankstellen/Parking → Auto Melanie
* mehrere Kleidergeschäfte → Kleider und Schuhe

Ablauf:

1. Tab/Filter wählen
2. mehrere Kandidaten markieren
3. Kategorie wählen
4. Kategorie auf Auswahl anwenden
5. Auswahl bestätigen
6. Confirm Dialog
7. fertig

## 5. Bulk Ignore / Reopen prüfen

Bitte sicherstellen:

* Auswahl ignorieren funktioniert
* Auswahl wieder öffnen funktioniert
* Audit vorhanden
* Toast/Feedback vorhanden

## 6. UI Details

Bitte PrimeVue-kompatibel:

* Toolbar oberhalb Tabelle
* Auswahlzähler
* Kategorie-Dropdown in Toolbar
* Buttons:

  * Kategorie anwenden
  * Auswahl bestätigen
  * Ignorieren
  * Wieder öffnen
* Buttons deaktivieren, wenn keine Auswahl
* klare Fehlermeldungen

Keine technischen IDs im User Mode.

## 7. Tests

Bitte Tests ergänzen für:

### Bulk
Assign

* mehrere Kandidaten auswählen
* Kategorie auf Auswahl anwenden
* proposed_category_id gesetzt
* Audit/Batch-Audit geschrieben
* Partial Success bei blockierten Kandidaten

### Bulk Confirm

* bestätigungsfähige Kandidaten werden produktive budget_transactions
* Kandidatenstatus confirmed
* confirmed_transaction_id gesetzt
* Kandidaten verschwinden aus Review
* Effektive Ausgaben zeigt Buchungen

### Blocker

* Kandidat ohne Kategorie blockiert Confirm
* duplicate_candidate blockiert normalen Confirm
* covered_by_source blockiert normalen Confirm
* transfer_candidate blockiert normalen Expense/Income Confirm

### Bulk Ignore/Reopen

* mehrere ignorieren
* mehrere wieder öffnen
* Audit

### UI

* Auswahlzähler sichtbar
* Dropdown sichtbar
* Buttons deaktiviert ohne Auswahl
* Confirm Dialog zeigt Zusammenfassung

### Safety

* keine Runtime-DB im Git
* keine echten Daten im Git
* Git-Safety sauber

## 8. Verifikation

Nach Umsetzung:

* Python compile
* pytest
* npm test
* npm run build
* source secret scan
* frontend build secret scan
* Git-Safety
* Browser sanity:

  * Buchungen prüfen
  * Effektive Ausgaben
  * Budgetstatus
* git diff --check
* Commit
* Push

## 9. Abschlussbericht

Bitte berichten:

* Mehrfachauswahl funktioniert: ja/nein
* Bulk-Kategorie-Zuweisung funktioniert: ja/nein
* Bulk Confirm funktioniert: ja/nein
* Bulk Ignore/Reopen funktioniert: ja/nein
* Blocker korrekt: ja/nein
* Effektive Ausgaben aktualisiert nach Confirm: ja/nein
* Tests
* Build
* Git-Safety
* Commit-Hash
* Push-Status
* offene Grenzen

Wichtig:
Das ist ein Produktivitäts-Fix. Bitte keinen neuen fachlichen Bereich starten.


Explanation:
**Assessing needed skills**

I need to take action and load the relevant skills related to finance, test-driven development (TDD), and possibly GitHub. I wonder how to best approach this gathering of skills to ensure I’m well-equipped. Am I considering all the right aspects? It’s important to think critically about what specific skills I need to focus on and how they will relate to my goals. I’ll prioritize them accordingly.


[skill_view] name=finance-system-architecture (86,802 chars)


[skill_view] name=test-driven-development (10,920 chars)


[skill_view] name=github-pr-workflow (14,656 chars)


[skill_view] name=vue-primevue-dashboard-migration (11,367 chars)


Akzeptiert. Ich starte den gezielten Bulk-Assign/Confirm-Fix ohne neue Importquellen/Fixkosten. Ich prüfe zuerst Branch/Stand und schreibe dann RED-Tests für Bulk Assign, Confirm, Blocker und UI.

todo

Preflight: Branch/Git-Status prüfen, Bulk-Review-Services/UI inventarisieren, neuen Sprint-Branch anlegen

RED-Tests: Bulk Assign, Bulk Confirm, Blocker, Ignore/Reopen, UI-Auswahl/Confirm-Dialog

Backend: Batch Assign/Preview/Confirm/Ignore/Reopen robuste Partial-Success-DTOs, Blocker, Audit

Frontend Buchungen prüfen: Toolbar, Auswahlzähler, Dropdown, Apply/Confirm/Ignore/Reopen, Dialog/Fehler pro Kandidat

Verifikation: compile, pytest, npm test/build, secret scans, Git-Safety, diff-check

Restart mit Tailscale API-Base, Browser sanity Review/Effective/Budgetstatus, Commit, Push, Abschlussbericht


terminal

set -euo pipefail
cd /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager
printf 'branch=' && git branch --show-current
git status --short --branch
printf 'head=' && git rev-parse HEAD


[terminal] ran `set -euo pipefail
cd /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager
printf 'branch=...` -> exit 0, 1 lines output


git checkout -b feat/budget-review-bulk-assign-confirm


Output: Zu neuem Branch 'feat/budget-review-bulk-assign-confirm' gewechselt


[read_file] read /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/frontend/src/pages/BudgetImportReviewPage.vue from line 1 (29,107 chars)


[read_file] read /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/src/jarvis_finance/services/budget_imports.py from line 1 (36,177 chars)


[read_file] read /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/frontend/src/api/budget.ts from line 1 (27,259 chars)


Der bestehende Code hat bereits erste Batch-Hooks, aber genau der Produktivitätsfall braucht harte Tests/Blocker/UX. Ich lokalisiere jetzt die Batch-Funktionen und API-Routen.

def preview_batch|def batch_|def confirm_transaction_candidate|batch_transaction


Explanation:
**Investigating search issues**

I think there might be a problem with searching, possibly related to regex handling the hyphen in some way. To figure this out, I plan to use execute_code to inspect how it's processing the input. I want to ensure that I'm troubleshooting effectively so I can pinpoint the issue. It's funny how little details can sometimes cause big problems! Let me see what I can uncover with the inspection.

from pathlib import Path
for p in [Path('/home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/src/jarvis_finance/services/budget_imports.py'), Path('/home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/src/jarvis_finance/api...[truncated]


[execute_code] `from pathlib import Path for p in [Path('/home/agent/.hermes...` (1 lines output)


[read_file] read /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/src/jarvis_finance/services/budget_imports.py from line 1320 (15,519 chars)


[read_file] read /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/src/jarvis_finance/services/budget_imports.py from line 1120 (20,830 chars)


[read_file] read /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/src/jarvis_finance/services/budget_imports.py from line 1070 (8,483 chars)


Preflight erledigt: Branch `feat/budget-review-bulk-assign-confirm` ist angelegt. Ich schreibe jetzt Backend-RED-Tests gegen die bestehenden Batch-Funktionen; dabei werden die aktuellen Lücken messbar.


[search_files] files search for '*budget*import*' in /home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/tests/unit -> 3 matches


     1|from __future__ import annotations
     2|
     3|import pytest
     4|from fastapi import HTTPException
     5|
     6|from jarvis_finance.services.budget_accounts import confirm_create_budget_account
     7|from jarvis_finance.services.budget_categories import confirm_create_category
     8|from jarvis_finance.services.budget_imports import (
     9|    apply_merchant_to_open_candidates,
    10|    create_merchant,
    11|    create_merchant_alias,
    12|    detect_duplicate_candidates,
    13|    list_merchants,
    14|    list_transaction_candidates,
    15|    merge_merchants,
    16|    create_budget_rule,
    17|    list_budget_rules,
    18|    update_budget_rule,
    19|    prioritize_budget_rule,
    20|    test_budget_rule as service_test_budget_rule,
    21|    apply_budget_rules_to_open_candidates,
    22|    seed_credit_card_candidates_from_rows,
    23|    seed_transaction_candidates_from_rows,
    24|    update_merchant_category,
    25|    confirm_transaction_candidate,
    26|)
    27|from jarvis_finance.services.budget_transactions import confirm_budget_transaction, list_budget_transactions
    28|from jarvis_finance.storage.database import connect_memory
    29|from jarvis_finance.storage.migrations import apply_migrations
    30|
    31|
    32|def db():
    33|    conn = connect_memory()
    34|    apply_migrations(conn)
    35|    return conn
    36|
    37|
    38|def setup_base(conn):
    39|    account = confirm_create_budget_account(conn, {"name": "Review Konto", "account_type": "cash", "currency": "CHF"})["entity_id"]
    40|    food = confirm_create_category(conn, {"name": "Essen & Haushalt", "category_type": "expense"})["entity_id"]
    41|    subs = confirm_create_category(conn, {"name": "Abos", "category_type": "expense"})["entity_id"]
    42|    health = confirm_create_category(conn, {"name": "Gesundheit / Medizin", "category_type": "expense"})["entity_id"]
    43|    return account, food, subs, health
    44|
    45|
    46|def test_merchant_alias_detects_candidates_sets_default_category_and_audits() -> None:
    47|    conn = db(); _account, _food, subs, _health = setup_base(conn)
    48|    merchant = create_merchant(conn, {"display_name": "Apple", "default_category_id": subs, "notes": "subscriptions"})
    49|    alias = create_merchant_alias(conn, merchant["merchant_id"], {"pattern": "APPLE.COM", "match_type": "contains", "source_type": "credit_card_csv", "priority": 5})
    50|    seed_credit_card_candidates_from_rows(conn, [{"Datum": "2026-03-01", "Beschreibung": "APPLE.COM/BILL", "Betrag": "9.90"}], source_file_label="card.csv")
    51|
    52|    applied = apply_merchant_to_open_candidates(conn, merchant["merchant_id"])
    53|    row = list_transaction_candidates(conn, merchant="apple")[0]
    54|
    55|    assert alias["status"] == "created"
    56|    assert applied["updated_count"] == 1
    57|    assert row["merchant_id"] == merchant["merchant_id"]
    58|    assert row["merchant_display_name"] == "Apple"
    59|    assert row["proposed_category_id"] == subs
    60|    assert row["status"] == "auto_categorized"
    61|    assert conn.execute("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM audit_log WHERE entity_type IN ('budget_merchant','budget_merchant_alias')").fetchone()[0] >= 2
    62|
    63|
    64|def test_merchant_merge_repoints_aliases_and_candidates_with_audit() -> None:
    65|    conn = db(); _account, _food, subs, _health = setup_base(conn)
    66|    target = create_merchant(conn, {"display_name": "Galaxus", "default_category_id": subs})
    67|    source = create_merchant(conn, {"display_name": "Digitec", "default_category_id": subs})
    68|    create_merchant_alias(conn, source["merchant_id"], {"pattern": "DIGITEC", "match_type": "contains"})
    69|    seed_credit_card_candidates_from_rows(conn, [{"Datum": "2026-03-02", "Beschreibung": "DIGITEC GALAXUS", "Betrag": "20.00"}], source_file_label="card.csv")
    70|    apply_merchant_to_open_candidates(conn, source["merchant_id"])
    71|
    72|    merged = merge_merchants(conn, source["merchant_id"], target["merchant_id"])
    73|
    74|    assert merged["status"] == "merged"
    75|    assert list_merchants(conn, include_inactive=True)[0]["display_name"] in {"Galaxus", "Digitec"}
    76|    assert conn.execute("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM budget_merchant_aliases WHERE merchant_id=?", (target["merchant_id"],)).fetchone()[0] == 1
    77|    assert conn.execute("SELECT merchant_id FROM budget_transaction_candidates WHERE description LIKE '%DIGITEC%'").fetchone()["merchant_id"] == target["merchant_id"]
    78|    assert conn.execute("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM audit_log WHERE action='budget_merchant_merged'").fetchone()[0] == 1
    79|
    80|
    81|def test_duplicate_detection_flags_near_date_same_amount_similar_merchant_and_protects_covered_source() -> None:
    82|    conn = db(); account, food, _subs, _health = setup_base(conn)
    83|    confirmed = confirm_budget_transaction(conn, {
    84|        "account_id": account,
    85|        "transaction_type": "expense",
    86|        "transaction_date": "2026-04-10",
    87|        "description": "Migros Einkauf",
    88|        "payee": "Migros",
    89|        "amount_original": "42.00",
    90|        "currency_original": "CHF",
    91|        "category_id": food,
    92|        "source_type": "manual",
    93|    })
    94|    seed_credit_card_candidates_from_rows(conn, [
    95|        {"Datum": "2026-04-12", "Beschreibung": "MIGROS MMM", "Betrag": "42.00"},
    96|        {"Datum": "2026-04-12", "Beschreibung": "MIGROS covered", "Betrag": "42.00"},
    97|    ], source_file_label="card.csv", migros_covered=False)
    98|    covered_id = [r for r in list_transaction_candidates(conn, include_reference=True) if "covered" in r["description"]][0]["transaction_candidate_id"]
    99|    conn.execute("UPDATE budget_transaction_candidates SET status='covered_by_source' WHERE transaction_candidate_id=?", (covered_id,))
   100|    conn.commit()
   101|
   102|    result = detect_duplicate_candidates(conn)
   103|    rows = list_transaction_candidates(conn, tab="duplicates")
   104|
   105|    assert result["duplicate_count"] >= 1
   106|    assert any(r["duplicate_of_transaction_id"] == confirmed["entity_id"] and r["status"] == "duplicate_candidate" for r in rows)
   107|    assert conn.execute("SELECT status FROM budget_transaction_candidates WHERE transaction_candidate_id=?", (covered_id,)).fetchone()["status"] == "covered_by_source"
   108|
   109|    dup = rows[0]
   110|    with pytest.raises(HTTPException):
   111|        confirm_transaction_candidate(conn, dup["transaction_candidate_id"], {"account_id": account, "budget_year": "2026"})
   112|    confirmed_anyway = confirm_transaction_candidate(conn, dup["transaction_candidate_id"], {"account_id": account, "category_id": food, "budget_year": "2026", "allow_duplicate": True})
   113|    assert confirmed_anyway["status"] == "confirmed"
   114|
   115|
   116|def test_rule_manager_updates_prioritizes_tests_and_applies_without_booking() -> None:
   117|    conn = db(); _account, food, subs, _health = setup_base(conn)
   118|    seed_credit_card_candidates_from_rows(conn, [{"Datum": "2026-05-01", "Beschreibung": "NETFLIX.COM", "Betrag": "19.90"}], source_file_label="card.csv", migros_covered=False)
   119|    rule = create_budget_rule(conn, {"merchant_contains": "Netflix", "category_id": food, "target_status": "review", "priority": 50, "confidence": "0.75"})
   120|
   121|    updated = update_budget_rule(conn, rule["rule_id"], {"category_id": subs, "target_status": "auto", "confidence": "0.91", "notes": "known subscription"})
   122|    prioritized = prioritize_budget_rule(conn, rule["rule_id"], 5)
   123|    preview = service_test_budget_rule(conn, rule["rule_id"])
   124|    applied = apply_budget_rules_to_open_candidates(conn, rule["rule_id"])
   125|    candidate = list_transaction_candidates(conn, tab="auto")[0]
   126|    rules = list_budget_rules(conn)
   127|
   128|    assert updated["status"] == "updated"
   129|    assert prioritized["priority"] == 5
   130|    assert preview["match_count"] == 1
   131|    assert preview["would_set_category"] == subs
   132|    assert preview["confidence"] == "0.91"
   133|    assert applied["productive_transaction_count"] == 0
   134|    assert candidate["proposed_category_id"] == subs
   135|    assert candidate["status"] == "auto_categorized"
   136|    assert rules[0]["priority"] == 5
   137|    assert conn.execute("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM budget_transactions").fetchone()[0] == 0
   138|


def update_transaction_candidate_category|def confirm_transaction_candidate|def ignore_transaction_candidate|def reopen_transaction_candidate


from pathlib import Path
s=Path('/home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/src/jarvis_finance/services/budget_imports.py').read_text()
for term in ['def update_transaction_candidate_category','def confirm_transaction_candidate','def ignore_transaction_candidate','def reopen_transaction_candidate']:
 i=s.find(term); print(term,i); print(s[i:i+1500])


Output:
def update_transaction_candidate_category 62179
def update_transaction_candidate_category(conn: Connection, candidate_id: str, category_id: str, note: str | None = None) -> dict[str, Any]:
    row = conn.execute("SELECT * FROM budget_transaction_candidates WHERE transaction_candidate_id=?", (candidate_id,)).fetchone()
    if not row:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="transaction candidate not found")
    if not conn.execute("SELECT 1 FROM budget_categories WHERE category_id=? AND is_active=1", (category_id,)).fetchone():
        raise HTTPException(status_code=422, detail="active category not found")
    cname = _category_name(conn, category_id)
    ts = now()
    conn.execute("UPDATE budget_transaction_candidates SET proposed_category_id=?, proposed_category_name=?, requires_review=0, status='pending', review_reason='user_category_override', updated_at=? WHERE transaction_candidate_id=?", (category_id, cname, ts, candidate_id))
    audit_id = record_audit_event(conn, source="vue_dashboard", action="update_category", entity_type="budget_transaction_candidate", entity_id=candidate_id, old_values=row_to_dict(row), new_values={"category_id": category_id, "category_name": cname}, user_text_note=note, created_by="user")
    conn.commit()
    return {"status": "updated", "entity_id": candidate_id, "audit_id": audit_id}

def create_candidate_split(conn: Connection, candidate_id: str, splits: list[dict[str, Any]]) -> dict[str, Any]:
    row = conn.execute("SELECT * FROM budget_transaction_candidates WHERE trans
def confirm_transaction_candidate 57807
def confirm_transaction_candidate(conn: Connection, candidate_id: str, payload: dict[str, Any]) -> dict[str, Any]:
    row = conn.execute("SELECT * FROM budget_transaction_candidates WHERE transaction_candidate_id=?", (candidate_id,)).fetchone()
    if not row:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="transaction candidate not found")
    if row["status"] == "confirmed":
        raise HTTPException(status_code=409, detail="candidate already confirmed")
    if row["status"] in {"covered_by_migros", "covered_by_source", "auto_ignored_duplicate", "superseded", "ignored", "reference_2025", "archived_reference"}:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=409, detail="candidate is not confirmable")
    if row["status"] in {"duplicate", "duplicate_candidate"} and not payload.get("allow_duplicate"):
        raise HTTPException(status_code=409, detail="duplicate candidate requires explicit allow_duplicate")
    if str(row["transaction_date"] or "")[:4] != str(payload.get("budget_year") or "2026"):
        raise HTTPException(status_code=409, detail="candidate outside active budget year")
    preview = preview_transaction_candidate(conn, candidate_id, payload)
    result = confirm_budget_transaction(conn, preview["payload"])
    ts = now()
    conn.execute("UPDATE budget_transaction_candidates SET status='confirmed', confirmed_transaction_id=?, confirmed_at=?, confirmed_by='user', updated_at=? WHERE transaction_candidate_id=?", (result["entity_id"], ts, ts, candidate_id))

def ignore_transaction_candidate 60039
def ignore_transaction_candidate(conn: Connection, candidate_id: str, note: str | None = None) -> dict[str, Any]:
    row = conn.execute("SELECT * FROM budget_transaction_candidates WHERE transaction_candidate_id=?", (candidate_id,)).fetchone()
    if not row:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="transaction candidate not found")
    ts = now()
    conn.execute("UPDATE budget_transaction_candidates SET status='ignored', notes=COALESCE(?, notes), updated_at=? WHERE transaction_candidate_id=?", (note, ts, candidate_id))
    audit_id = record_audit_event(conn, source="vue_dashboard", action="ignore", entity_type="budget_transaction_candidate", entity_id=candidate_id, old_values={"status": row["status"]}, new_values={"status": "ignored"}, created_by="user")
    conn.commit()
    return {"status": "ignored", "entity_id": candidate_id, "audit_id": audit_id, "message": "Buchungskandidat ignoriert"}

def reopen_transaction_candidate(conn: Connection, candidate_id: str, note: str | None = None) -> dict[str, Any]:
    row = conn.execute("SELECT * FROM budget_transaction_candidates WHERE transaction_candidate_id=?", (candidate_id,)).fetchone()
    if not row:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="transaction candidate not found")
    if row["status"] == "confirmed":
        raise HTTPException(status_code=409, detail="confirmed candidates cannot be reopened")
    new_status = "needs_review" if row["requires_review"] else "pending"
    ts = now()
    conn.
def reopen_transaction_candidate 60962
def reopen_transaction_candidate(conn: Connection, candidate_id: str, note: str | None = None) -> dict[str, Any]:
    row = conn.execute("SELECT * FROM budget_transaction_candidates WHERE transaction_candidate_id=?", (candidate_id,)).fetchone()
    if not row:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="transaction candidate not found")
    if row["status"] == "confirmed":
        raise HTTPException(status_code=409, detail="confirmed candidates cannot be reopened")
    new_status = "needs_review" if row["requires_review"] else "pending"
    ts = now()
    conn.execute("UPDATE budget_transaction_candidates SET status=?, review_reason=COALESCE(review_reason, 'user_reopened'), notes=COALESCE(?, notes), updated_at=? WHERE transaction_candidate_id=?", (new_status, note, ts, candidate_id))
    audit_id = record_audit_event(conn, source="vue_dashboard", action="reopen", entity_type="budget_transaction_candidate", entity_id=candidate_id, old_values={"status": row["status"]}, new_values={"status": new_status}, user_text_note=note, created_by="user")
    conn.commit()
    return {"status": new_status, "entity_id": candidate_id, "audit_id": audit_id, "message": "Buchungskandidat wieder geöffnet"}

def update_transaction_candidate_category(conn: Connection, candidate_id: str, category_id: str, note: str | None = None) -> dict[str, Any]:
    row = conn.execute("SELECT * FROM budget_transaction_candidates WHERE transaction_candidate_id=?", (candidate_id,)).fetchone()
    if not


from pathlib import Path
s=Path('/home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/src/jarvis_finance/services/budget_imports.py').read_text()
i=s.find('def preview_transaction_candidate')
print(s[i:i+2400])


Output:
def preview_transaction_candidate(conn: Connection, candidate_id: str, payload: dict[str, Any] | None = None) -> dict[str, Any]:
    row = conn.execute("SELECT * FROM budget_transaction_candidates WHERE transaction_candidate_id=?", (candidate_id,)).fetchone()
    if not row:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="transaction candidate not found")
    payload = payload or {}
    cat_id = payload.get("category_id") or row["proposed_category_id"]
    notes = row["notes"] or ""
    tx_type = payload.get("transaction_type") or "expense"
    try:
        meta = json.loads(notes) if notes and notes.startswith("{") else {}
        tx_type = payload.get("transaction_type") or meta.get("transaction_type") or tx_type
    except json.JSONDecodeError:
        pass
    if not cat_id and tx_type in {"expense", "income"}:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=422, detail="category required before confirm")
    if cat_id and not conn.execute("SELECT 1 FROM budget_categories WHERE category_id=? AND is_active=1", (cat_id,)).fetchone():
        raise HTTPException(status_code=422, detail="active category required before confirm")
    if not payload.get("account_id"):
        raise HTTPException(status_code=422, detail="account_id required before confirm")
    if not row["transaction_date"]:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=422, detail="transaction date required before confirm")
    if not row["amount_original"]:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=422, detail="amount required before confirm")
    if not row["currency_original"]:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=422, detail="currency required before confirm")
    return {
        "preview_id": new_id("preview"),
        "summary": "Buchungskandidat übernehmen",
        "warnings": ["Möglicher Duplikat-Treffer"] if row["duplicate_of_transaction_id"] else ([] if cat_id or tx_type == "transfer" else ["Kategorie fehlt"]),
        "payload": {
            "account_id": payload.get("account_id"),
            "transaction_type": tx_type,
            "transaction_date": payload.get("transaction_date") or row["transaction_date"],
            "description": payload.get("description") or row["description"],
            "payee": payload.get("payee") or row["merchant"],
            "amount_original": row["amount_original"],
            "currency_original": row["currency_original"],
            "category_id":


from pathlib import Path
s=Path('/home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/src/jarvis_finance/services/budget_imports.py').read_text()
i=s.find('def preview_transaction_candidate')
print(s[i+2400:i+4300])


Output:
 cat_id,
            "source_type": "import_candidate",
            "source_candidate_id": candidate_id,
            "notes": f"Confirmed from transaction candidate {candidate_id}",
        },
    }

def confirm_transaction_candidate(conn: Connection, candidate_id: str, payload: dict[str, Any]) -> dict[str, Any]:
    row = conn.execute("SELECT * FROM budget_transaction_candidates WHERE transaction_candidate_id=?", (candidate_id,)).fetchone()
    if not row:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="transaction candidate not found")
    if row["status"] == "confirmed":
        raise HTTPException(status_code=409, detail="candidate already confirmed")
    if row["status"] in {"covered_by_migros", "covered_by_source", "auto_ignored_duplicate", "superseded", "ignored", "reference_2025", "archived_reference"}:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=409, detail="candidate is not confirmable")
    if row["status"] in {"duplicate", "duplicate_candidate"} and not payload.get("allow_duplicate"):
        raise HTTPException(status_code=409, detail="duplicate candidate requires explicit allow_duplicate")
    if str(row["transaction_date"] or "")[:4] != str(payload.get("budget_year") or "2026"):
        raise HTTPException(status_code=409, detail="candidate outside active budget year")
    preview = preview_transaction_candidate(conn, candidate_id, payload)
    result = confirm_budget_transaction(conn, preview["payload"])
    ts = now()
    conn.execute("UPDATE budget_transaction_candidates SET status='confirmed', confirmed_transaction_id=?, confirmed_at=?, confirmed_by='user', updated_at=? WHERE transaction_candidate_id=?", (result["entity_id"], ts, ts, candidate_id))
    record_audit_event(conn, source="vue_dashboard", action="budget_transaction_created", entity_type="budget_transaction", entity_id=result["entity_id"], new_values={"source_candidate_id": candidate_id


from pathlib import Path
s=Path('/home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/src/jarvis_finance/services/budget_imports.py').read_text()
i=s.find('record_audit_event(conn, source="vue_dashboard", action="budget_transaction_created"')
print(s[i:i+800])


Output:
record_audit_event(conn, source="vue_dashboard", action="budget_transaction_created", entity_type="budget_transaction", entity_id=result["entity_id"], new_values={"source_candidate_id": candidate_id}, created_by="user")
    audit_id = record_audit_event(conn, source="vue_dashboard", action="candidate_confirmed", entity_type="budget_transaction_candidate", entity_id=candidate_id, old_values={"status": row["status"]}, new_values={"status": "confirmed", "confirmed_transaction_id": result["entity_id"], "category_id": preview["payload"].get("category_id")}, created_by="user")
    conn.commit()
    return {"status": "confirmed", "entity_id": result["entity_id"], "audit_id": audit_id, "message": "Buchungskandidat übernommen"}

def ignore_transaction_candidate(conn: Connection, candidate_id: str,


from __future__ import annotations

from jarvis_finance.services.budget_accounts import confirm_create_budget_account
from jarvis_finance.services.budget_categories import confirm_create_category
from jarvis_finance.services.budget_imports import (
    batch_mark_candidates,
    list_transaction_candidates,
    preview_batch_confirm_candidates,
    seed_credit_card_candidates_from_rows,
)
from jarvis_finance.services.budget_transactions import list_budget_transactions
from jarvis_finance.storage.database import connect_memory
from jarvis_finance.storage.migrations import apply_migrations

def db():
    conn = connect_memory()
    apply_migrations(conn)
    return conn

def setup_bulk(conn):
    account_id = confirm_create_budget_account(conn, {"name": "Review Konto", "account_type": "cash", "currency": "CHF"})["entity_id"]
    food_id = confirm_create_category(conn, {"name": "Essen & Haushalt", "category_type": "expense"})["entity_id"]
    media_id = confirm_create_category(conn, {"name": "Elektronische Medien", "category_type": "expense"})["entity_id"]
    seed_credit_card_candidates_from_rows(
        conn,
        [
            {"Datum": "2026-05-01", "Beschreibung": "APPLE.COM/BILL", "Betrag": "9.90"},
            {"Datum": "2026-05-02", "Beschreibung": "GOOGLE STORAGE", "Betrag": "2.00"},
            {"Datum": "2026-05-03", "Beschreibung": "NETFLIX", "Betrag": "19.90"},
            {"Datum": "2026-05-04", "Beschreibung": "COVERED SOURCE", "Betrag": "5.00"},
        ],
        source_file_label="visa.csv",
        migros_covered=False,
    )
    rows = list_transaction_candidates(conn, include_reference=True)
    by_desc = {row["description"]: row["transaction_candidate_id"] for row in rows}
    conn.execute("UPDATE budget_transaction_candidates SET status='covered_by_source' WHERE transaction_candidate_id=?", (by_desc["COVERED SOURCE"],))
    conn.commit()
    return account_id, food_id, media_id, by_desc

def test_bulk_category_assignment_updates_only_editable_candidates_and_reports_partial_errors() -> None:
    conn = db()
    _account_id, _food_id, media_id, ids = setup_bulk(conn)

    result = batch_mark_candidates(
        conn,
        candidate_ids=[ids["APPLE.COM/BILL"], ids["GOOGLE STORAGE"], ids["COVERED SOURCE"]],
        action="category",
        category_id=media_id,
        budget_year="2026",
    )

    assert result["updated_count"] == 2
    assert result["skipped_count"] == 1
    assert result["errors"][0]["candidate_id"] == ids["COVERED SOURCE"]
    editable = conn.execute("SELECT proposed_category_id FROM budget_transaction_candidates WHERE transaction_candidate_id=?", (ids["APPLE.COM/BILL"],)).fetchone()
    blocked = conn.execute("SELECT proposed_category_id, status FROM budget_transaction_candidates WHERE transaction_candidate_id=?", (ids["COVERED SOURCE"],)).fetchone()
    assert editable["proposed_category_id"] == media_id
    assert blocked["proposed_category_id"] is None
    assert blocked["status"] == "covered_by_source"
    assert conn.execute("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM audit_log WHERE action IN ('batch_category_candidates','update_category')").fetchone()[0] >= 2

def test_bulk_confirm_preview_blocks_duplicates_covered_transfer_and_missing_categories() -> None:
    conn = db()
    account_id, _food_id, media_id, ids = setup_bulk(conn)
    batch_mark_candidates(conn, candidate_ids=[ids["APPLE.COM/BILL"]], action="category", category_id=media_id, budget_year="2026")
    conn.execute("UPDATE budget_transaction_candidates SET status='duplicate_candidate' WHERE transaction_candidate_id=?", (ids["GOOGLE STORAGE"],))
    conn.execute("UPDATE budget_transaction_candidates SET status='transfer_candidate', classification='transfer_candidate' WHERE transaction_candidate_id=?", (ids["NETFLIX"],))
    conn.commit()

    preview = preview_batch_confirm_candidates(
        conn,
        candidate_ids=[ids["APPLE.COM/BILL"], ids["GOOGLE STORAGE"], ids["NETFLIX"], ids["COVERED SOURCE"]],
        account_id=account_id,
        budget_year="2026",
    )

    assert preview["count"] == 1
    reasons = {item["candidate_id"]: item["reason"] for item in preview["conflicts"]}
    assert "duplicate" in reasons[ids["GOOGLE STORAGE"]]
    assert "transfer" in reasons[ids["NETFLIX"]]
    assert "covered_by_source" in reasons[ids["COVERED SOURCE"]]
    assert preview["blockers"]["duplicate_candidates"] == 1
    assert preview["blockers"]["transfer_candidates"] == 1
    assert preview["blockers"]["covered_by_source"] == 1
    assert preview["blockers"]["without_category"] == 0

def test_bulk_confirm_creates_transactions_sets_candidate_links_and_removes_from_open_review() -> None:
    conn = db()
    account_id, _food_id, media_id, ids = setup_bulk(conn)
    selected = [ids["APPLE.COM/BILL"], ids["GOOGLE STORAGE"]]
    batch_mark_candidates(conn, candidate_ids=selected, action="category", category_id=media_id, budget_year="2026")
    preview = preview_batch_confirm_candidates(conn, candidate_ids=selected, account_id=account_id, budget_year="2026")

    result = batch_mark_candidates(
        conn,
        candidate_ids=selected,
        action="confirm",
        account_id=account_id,
        preview_id=preview["preview_id"],
        budget_year="2026",
    )

    assert result["confirmed_count"] == 2
    assert result["skipped_count"] == 0
    rows = conn.execute("SELECT status, confirmed_transaction_id FROM budget_transaction_candidates WHERE transaction_candidate_id IN (?, ?) ORDER BY transaction_candidate_id", selected).fetchall()
    assert {row["status"] for row in rows} == {"confirmed"}
    assert all(row["confirmed_transaction_id"] for row in rows)
    assert len(list_budget_transactions(conn, tx_type="expense", year="2026")) == 2
    open_ids = {row["transaction_candidate_id"] for row in list_transaction_candidates(conn)}
    assert not set(selected) & open_ids

def test_bulk_ignore_and_reopen_multiple_candidates_with_audit() -> None:
    conn = db()
    _account_id, _food_id, _media_id, ids = setup_bulk(conn)
    selected = [ids["APPLE.COM/BILL"], ids["GOOGLE STORAGE"]]

    ignored = batch_mark_candidates(conn, candidate_ids=selected, action="ignore", budget_year="2026")
    reopened = batch_mark_candidates(conn, candidate_ids=selected, action="reopen", budget_year="2026")

    assert ignored["ignored_count"] == 2
    assert reopened["reopened_count"] == 2
    statuses = {row["status"] for row in conn.execute("SELECT status FROM budget_transaction_candidates WHERE transaction_candidate_id IN (?, ?)", selected).fetchall()}
    assert statuses <= {"pending", "needs_review"}
    assert conn.execute("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM audit_log WHERE action IN ('batch_ignore_candidates','batch_reopen_candidates','ignore','reopen')").fetchone()[0] >= 4


LSP diagnostics introduced by this edit:
<diagnostics file="/home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/tests/unit/test_budget_review_bulk_assign_confirm.py">
ERROR [114:47] No parameter named "tx_type" [reportCallIssue] (Pyright)
</diagnostics>


source ~/jarvis_runtime/finance-system/venv/bin/activate && unset JARVIS_FINANCE_DB_PATH && PYTHONPATH=src pytest tests/unit/test_budget_review_bulk_assign_confirm.py -q


Output:
FFF.                                                                     [100%]
=================================== FAILURES ===================================
_ test_bulk_category_assignment_updates_only_editable_candidates_and_reports_partial_errors _

    def test_bulk_category_assignment_updates_only_editable_candidates_and_reports_partial_errors() -> None:
        conn = db()
        _account_id, _food_id, media_id, ids = setup_bulk(conn)

        result = batch_mark_candidates(
            conn,
            candidate_ids=[ids["APPLE.COM/BILL"], ids["GOOGLE STORAGE"], ids["COVERED SOURCE"]],
            action="category",
            category_id=media_id,
            budget_year="2026",
        )

>       assert result["updated_count"] == 2
E       assert 3 == 2

tests/unit/test_budget_review_bulk_assign_confirm.py:56: AssertionError
_ test_bulk_confirm_preview_blocks_duplicates_covered_transfer_and_missing_categories _

    def test_bulk_confirm_preview_blocks_duplicates_covered_transfer_and_missing_categories() -> None:
        conn = db()
        account_id, _food_id, media_id, ids = setup_bulk(conn)
        batch_mark_candidates(conn, candidate_ids=[ids["APPLE.COM/BILL"]], action="category", category_id=media_id, budget_year="2026")
        conn.execute("UPDATE budget_transaction_candidates SET status='duplicate_candidate' WHERE transaction_candidate_id=?", (ids["GOOGLE STORAGE"],))
        conn.execute("UPDATE budget_transaction_candidates SET status='transfer_candidate', classification='transfer_candidate' WHERE transaction_candidate_id=?", (ids["NETFLIX"],))
        conn.commit()

        preview = preview_batch_confirm_candidates(
            conn,
            candidate_ids=[ids["APPLE.COM/BILL"], ids["GOOGLE STORAGE"], ids["NETFLIX"], ids["COVERED SOURCE"]],
            account_id=account_id,
            budget_year="2026",
        )

        assert preview["count"] == 1
        reasons = {item["candidate_id"]: item["reason"] for item in preview["conflicts"]}
>       assert "duplicate" in reasons[ids["GOOGLE STORAGE"]]
E       AssertionError: assert 'duplicate' in '422: category required before confirm'

tests/unit/test_budget_review_bulk_assign_confirm.py:84: AssertionError
_ test_bulk_confirm_creates_transactions_sets_candidate_links_and_removes_from_open_review _

    def test_bulk_confirm_creates_transactions_sets_candidate_links_and_removes_from_open_review() -> None:
        conn = db()
        account_id, _food_id, media_id, ids = setup_bulk(conn)
        selected = [ids["APPLE.COM/BILL"], ids["GOOGLE STORAGE"]]
        batch_mark_candidates(conn, candidate_ids=selected, action="category", category_id=media_id, budget_year="2026")
        preview = preview_batch_confirm_candidates(conn, candidate_ids=selected, account_id=account_id, budget_year="2026")

        result = batch_mark_candidates(
            conn,
            candidate_ids=selected,
            action="confirm",
            account_id=account_id,
            preview_id=preview["preview_id"],
            budget_year="2026",
        )

        assert result["confirmed_count"] == 2
        assert result["skipped_count"] == 0
        rows = conn.execute("SELECT status, confirmed_transaction_id FROM budget_transaction_candidates WHERE transaction_candidate_id IN (?, ?) ORDER BY transaction_candidate_id", selected).fetchall()
        assert {row["status"] for row in rows} == {"confirmed"}
        assert all(row["confirmed_transaction_id"] for row in rows)
>       assert len(list_budget_transactions(conn, tx_type="expense", year="2026")) == 2
                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
E       TypeError: list_budget_transactions() got an unexpected keyword argument 'tx_type'

tests/unit/test_budget_review_bulk_assign_confirm.py:114: TypeError
=========================== short test summary info ============================
FAILED tests/unit/test_budget_review_bulk_assign_confirm.py::test_bulk_category_assignment_updates_only_editable_candidates_and_reports_partial_errors
FAILED tests/unit/test_budget_review_bulk_assign_confirm.py::test_bulk_confirm_preview_blocks_duplicates_covered_transfer_and_missing_categories
FAILED tests/unit/test_budget_review_bulk_assign_confirm.py::test_bulk_confirm_creates_transactions_sets_candidate_links_and_removes_from_open_review
3 failed, 1 passed in 0.42s


RED ist sauber sichtbar: Bulk-Category bearbeitet blockierte Kandidaten, Preview blockt Duplikate/Transfers nicht gezielt. Ein Test hatte nur einen falschen Helper-Parameter; ich korrigiere den Test, dann implementiere minimal.


def list_budget_transactions(conn: Connection, *, month: str | None = None, year: str | None = "2026", account_id: str | None = None, category_id: str | None = None, transaction_type: str | None = None, merchant: str | None = None, tag: str | None = None, status: str | None = None, source_type: str | None = None, search: str | None = None, date_from: str | None = None, date_to: str | None = None) -> list[dict]:

clauses = ["1=1"]


patch

assert len(list_budget_transactions(conn, tx_type="expense", year="2026")) == 2

assert len(list_budget_transactions(conn, transaction_type="expense", year="2026")) == 2


--- a//home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/tests/unit/test_budget_review_bulk_assign_confirm.py
+++ b//home/agent/.hermes/repos/FinanceManager/tests/unit/test_budget_review_bulk_assign_confirm.py
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@
     rows = conn.execute("SELECT status, confirmed_transaction_id FROM budget_transaction_candidates WHERE transaction_candidate_id IN (?, ?) ORDER BY transaction_candidate_id", selected).fetchall()
     assert {row["status"] for row in rows} == {"confirmed"}
     assert all(row["confirmed_transaction_id"] for row in rows)
-    assert len(list_budget_transactions(conn, tx_type="expense", year="2026")) == 2
+    assert len(list_budget_transactions(conn, transaction_type="expense", year="2026")) == 2
     open_ids = {row["transaction_candidate_id"] for row in list_transaction_candidates(conn)}
     assert not set(selected) & open_ids


todo

Preflight: Branch/Git-Status prüfen, Bulk-Review-Services/UI inventarisieren, neuen Sprint-Branch anlegen

RED-Tests: Bulk Assign, Bulk Confirm, Blocker, Ignore/Reopen, UI-Auswahl/Confirm-Dialog

Backend: Batch Assign/Preview/Confirm/Ignore/Reopen robuste Partial-Success-DTOs, Blocker, Audit


Frontend Buchungen prüfen: Toolbar, Auswahlzähler, Dropdown, Apply/Confirm/Ignore/Reopen, Dialog/Fehler pro Kandidat

Verifikation: compile, pytest, npm test/build, secret scans, Git-Safety, diff-check

Restart mit Tailscale API-Base, Browser sanity Review/Effective/Budgetstatus, Commit, Push, Abschlussbericht